the Elias forum: Digests of Essential Elias.











Elias “gems”

ELIAS: “The reason you are manifest within this dimension – your purpose, your mission, your reason – is to experience. You are NOT manifest within this dimension in a school. You are NOT manifest in this dimension to be accomplishing of great deeds, although you may be choosing to be experiencing this. You ARE manifest within this dimension, and ANY physical dimension, merely to experience the purity and qualities of physical action.

Within this particular dimension, you have created this reality based upon the exploration of two basic elements of physical focus; sexuality and emotion. You experience both of these elements intensely. All of your creations within this particular dimension reflect these basic elements. You may even look to a rock, and this stone shall invoke within you a feeling of male or female and an emotion if you are so tuning into it, for ALL of your reality reflects these elements in this particular dimension.” [session 270, March 19, 1998]

ELIAS: “Within this particular dimension, THIS physical dimension, I have stated many times: you hold countless other dimensions within this dimension. You hold time dimensions and you hold alternate dimensions. These are not probable dimensions. That would be a different subject matter entirely, for probable realities are those realities which you within this dimension create and insert elsewhere in consciousness. These of which I speak this evening are dimensions in themselves.” [session 280, May 14, 1998]

ELIAS: “This particular dimension is exceedingly diverse, and you have offered yourselves within this particular dimension the opportunity to explore immense creativity and creations. Look about you at what you have created already! And now you move into the area of not expressing outwardly in the creation of your planet, of your world, of your inventions, of your expressions, but now you move into the MORE expansive area of creativity, in expressing what you are and who you are and what you may access. You hold presently the ability to access ALL of your focuses of essence. The veil is very thin. You have created this! You may access other areas of consciousness, not within ‘chanting trances’ (grinning) but within your objective waking state, that which you manipulate so very well and have accomplished so very well within.” [session 284, May 30, 1998]

ELIAS: “... I have expressed previously, there are many, many, many, many universes and dimensions within your one dimension that you recognize. There are dimensions of time; there are parallel dimensions; there are probable dimensions. All of these dimensions are, in a figurative manner of speaking, subdivisions of what you view as your officially accepted dimension.

JOE: And all of these dimensions are encompassed in like an overall dimension called Regional Area 1?

ELIAS: Yes. They are all contained within it.” [session 481, September 30, 1999]

GEORGE: “And that brings up the thought that a focus is equivalent to a belief system, and whether that is a physical focus or a non-physical focus?

ELIAS: No. Belief systems are a design which is incorporated in this physical dimension, and these belief systems that are incorporated in your physical dimension are relative to your physical dimension and are not necessarily relative to other areas of consciousness or to many other physical dimensions. Your physical dimension is not the only physical dimension that incorporates belief systems.

But the belief systems that you do incorporate are unique to your physical dimension, and are relative to the expression of your physical dimension. They are, in a manner of speaking, an intricate element of the design of this particular physical dimension. They are an aspect of its structure.” [session 821, April 12, 2001]

ELIAS: “There are COUNTLESS dimensions within consciousness. Yes, there is one consciousness, although it may not be deemed as ‘one consciousness’ for that would be a distortion, for that suggests an entity and consciousness is not an entity. It is a movement.

Now; in this, you have chosen to be manifest in this physical reality in curiosity. For you are consciousness, for you are essence, and you are also manifest in other physical dimensions, and you are present in all areas of consciousness. This is merely one.

And why should you not explore? As I have stated from the onset of this forum, this particular physical dimension is one of the most diverse and complex of all of the physical dimensions. Therefore, it is intriguing. You have created an immensely complex and diverse arena for exploration, and it has been designed with two extensively diverse base elements, emotion and sexuality – physicality and communication. In this, the exploration is limitless, for your guidelines are very few. Your boundaries, so to speak, are very few.” [session 1398, July 19, 2003]

Elias “gems”

DREW: “Time is another dimension of physical reality, correct? Time is a dimension of physical reality created essentially for physical reality.

ELIAS: Correct.

DREW: So, those not familiar with the material shared in this forum may look at the world and refer to it as three-dimensional. That’s a very common term that people refer to objective reality as, three-dimensional. Time would be a fourth dimension.

ELIAS: Correct, which you do occupy four dimensions.

DREW: Okay. Well, my question is, are there additional dimensions? We may have talked about this. Is color a dimension?

ELIAS: Yes, although within your reality you do not hold an understanding of this.

DREW: Is an understanding of it required for it to be another dimension of physical reality? I guess what I’m leaning to is, is it possible to put a number on the number of dimensions in physical reality, or is it a limitless number? (Elias nods) It is a limitless number.


DREW: So there are dimensions, now I’m not talking about the number of dimensions of reality ...

ELIAS: Correct.

DREW: ... merely the number of dimensions in this physical reality.

ELIAS: Correct.

DREW: But that is still a limitless number.


DREW: And so there are dimensions within this reality that we don’t even recognize as dimensions.


DREW: And you may point out a dimension or tell me of a dimension in this physical reality, that even with your explanation I might not recognize?


DREW: So they are ... Well, they’re not truths, but they are frameworks that we’ve created in physical reality. Is that correct?

ELIAS: No. Dimensions exist within consciousness, for they exist within essence.

BOB: Including time?


BOB: But time doesn’t take the same form in all dimensions.

ELIAS: Correct. I expressed to you recently that time is a creation, but it also is a thing within itself.

DREW: And so dimensions exist in essence. Do we then, for lack of a better term, pick and choose which dimensions we are going to use in physical reality to create physical reality, or are we using of them all but only recognizing of a very limited few?

ELIAS: You are using of them all. Your attention, connected with each aspect, recognizes one.

DREW: Recognizes one what?

ELIAS: Dimension.

DREW: I’m sorry. I need you to run that by me again. Because in our physical reality, even though we don’t recognize the multitudinous dimensions, we do recognize more than one, do we not? Such as time, space; at least those two.

ELIAS: Do you??? (Grinning)

DREW: Well, if we commonly refer to physical reality as three-dimensional, is that just a belief system and a term that’s not really correct?

ELIAS: No, this is a correct terminology, although you in actually are not quite understanding and recognizing of the reality of what you express. You express that you exist within a three-dimensional reality. You believe the interpretation of three-dimensional reality is dealing with matter and space. Space you may equate as illusionary.

DREW: Is space a dimension?

ELIAS: Yes and no. It is a dimension within physical perception. Within consciousness, no.

DREW: But time is.

ELIAS: Yes, and also no; for within certain areas of consciousness it holds no meaning.

DREW: But it does exist in essence, unlike space.

ELIAS: Space exists within your physical reality. Therefore, it also exists within essence, but only directly within relation to physical manifestation.

DREW: So speaking strictly in terms of physical manifestation, and I understand what you’re saying is that when we talk about three-dimensional reality, when we use the word dimension it’s different from the way you’re using the word dimension, because our references to three dimensions are all spatial; height, width, and depth; whereas space in our physical reality is really one dimension.

ELIAS: Correct.

DREW: Okay. Time is one dimension. There are limitless such dimensions in physical reality.

ELIAS: Correct.

DREW: Did you say that color is one in physical reality? (Elias nods) Color is. Can you give us an example ... Let me see if I can come up with some other ones! (Elias grins) Let’s do it that way. Sound?

ELIAS: Tone.

DREW: Well, but tone can be interpreted in physical reality as a lot of things other than audible sound.

ELIAS: Correct.

DREW: So, I’m talking about audible sound. Is that a dimension in physical reality?


DREW: Okay ...

ELIAS: You are attempting to be separating of your reality into separate dimensions that you may identify. When I am expressing to you that there are many dimensions in relation to the one that you recognize within your attention, you may be inclusive of all that you recognize within this one attention. There are many elements that you are not recognizing of.

Now; I shall express also that another dimension of your reality that you may attune yourself to and be recognizing of is your unofficial information. (Pause, while everybody considers this)

BOB: Can you use the term awareness? Is awareness a dimension?

ELIAS: In part, you may express to yourself that different awarenesses are indicative of different dimensions, although I shall express that attention is more efficient within definition within your language, for your awareness may occupy many dimensions simultaneously within this present now, within this dimension. This allows you unofficial information. Therefore, I direct you to attention instead.

NORM: Could you say that the universal dimension in all realities is action, and that all dimensions are really a development of action?

ELIAS: All consciousness is action. (Pause)

NORM: So is that considered a dimension? (Pause)

ELIAS: You may consider dimensions differences in actions. Just as you may view different focuses of yourself, or more simply you may think and believe to yourselves that you hold lifetimes, these are differences within action. In like manner, you may think of dimensions within consciousness as differences within actions.” [session 157, March 09, 1997]

Q: “Is there anything to destiny? Does it differ from probable realities? Is it super-charged, or is it non-existent, or is it just a belief system?

ELIAS: Destiny – an imaginative belief system! There are no closed systems. There are no absolutes that may not be altered within probabilities. The only absolutes that hold significance are those that are truths, which transcend all dimensions and all focuses of consciousness physical and non-physical, which you do not recognize!

Within probabilities, I express to you ... ... ... your probabilities do not exist before you. You do not choose from an arrangement of elements that are already within existence, so to speak, in your interpretation. You are continuously within a state of becoming. Therefore, within every moment of consciousness, you create the probabilities. You do not choose from those elements which you believe to exist already. They are not displayed before you. You create them each moment, and as you create each probability as a new event, you also simultaneously create all other probabilities which are within an aspect of the choice that you have created.

This is not to say that you choose to cross a street, therefore within another probability, another you only does not cross the street. Within the energy and freedom of the energy within consciousness, this may be translated in planting a flower within another reality, for the energy has rearranged to actualize aspects of probabilities in every possible area. It may bear no resemblance to your thought process of probabilities, but energy is unlimited and is continuously reconstructing itself and manifesting continuously in every area. (Humorously) Therefore, as you choose to actualize a probability, you may discard your idea that you have pulled this from your cosmos and chosen this event from the vast library of events! (Laughter) For you have created a new event within energy which has never before been conceived.” [session 185, June 21, 1997]

ELIAS: “The subject of dimensions within this dimension is difficult to be presenting objectively within your understanding. I may offer a very simplified example to you.

You exist here within physical focus, within what you recognize objectively. This is your dimension. You manifest within this dimension of physical focus, but within this dimension of physical focus there are many other dimensions of time fragments, for all of the time frameworks are simultaneous in actuality, but you separate them into different dimensions of time. Therefore, in engaging another focus within your new game (1) or within a meditation or within a waking state, in actuality what you are accomplishing is stepping through a dimension of time framework and allowing yourself to move into a different dimension of time framework.

There are many different time framework dimensions within this dimension. The whole of this dimension is the type of physical focus that you have chosen to be creating. The focuses of this dimension occupy countless dimensions, or even within one focus there are countless dimensions to be accessed, for each moment creates its own dimension and continues. Therefore, you may access and meet you, occupying the dimension of age ten. You may intersect with you and interact with you at age eighteen, for these continue simultaneously, but not within your objective awareness, for they move into another dimension within this dimension!” [session 218, September 15, 1997]

JIM: “I don’t understand the concept very well of other dimensions. The only thing I can relate to is like a metaphor. There used to be television show in the 1960’s called Rod Serling’s Outer Limits, in which somebody was walking and they just seemed to turn and disappear in that same space. They just disappeared. Is this ... how do I come to grips with what another dimension is?

ELIAS: This would be quite accurate! It is merely as you would be within your physical focus moving from one room into another. All of these dimensions exist within the same space arrangement. Therefore, all other dimensions exist here. You need only turn your attention, and you may not be ‘here’ any longer!

JIM: This spatial dimension, what our scientists or astronomers think of as the universe, is, they think, fourteen billion light years across. How accurate is this?

ELIAS: It is quite amusing! Your scientists are very amusing actually, for they view so very scientifically, and they do not view the vastness of what they think they view! What they view is much greater than what they think they view. It is boundless. They search for other universes beyond your universe. There is no ‘beyond your universe,’ for all space arrangements occupy the same space!

JIM: And it is boundless?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Infinite?

ELIAS: Correct. There is no ‘edge.’ I express to you that your scientists of this day view their universe as your individuals viewed your world, in viewing it to be flat and holding an edge that you may fall off of! There is no edge to your universe. You shall not approach the end of your universe and be faced with a wall, for there is no edge!” [session 232, October 31, 1997]

NORM: “I suppose what I’d like to talk about is the philosophy of how to carry on the experiment. My idea had been that the concept of consciousness with everything ... that the photons or the bosons or the fermions always have a choice in doing things, and that if the experimental setup is correct, then the probability of those things leaving this particular dimension is high enough that it can be monitored with experimental equipment, and I wanted to do that in a fashion that kind of goes along with your statement that there are no closed systems. That statement, if I interpret it according to physics, means that some of the conservation laws of physics are not strictly true: the conservation of mass, the conservation of energy, the conservation of charge, and so on and so forth. That would be a wonderful thing for an experiment to show, that indeed there are time segments where those conservation laws are not strictly valid. Is that a legitimate thing to experimentally work on?

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: Okay. It’s really fascinating to think about the gestalt of links in a particle or an atom and how they work together and form that particle or atom, and also have perhaps a group consciousness, I would imagine. Am I on the right track there?

ELIAS: It is a cooperation.

NORM: A cooperation. That’s a general statement, a general law, right? There’s no separateness, so to speak, but yet there IS some separateness.

ELIAS: Correct, although this would not be a LAW, but you are correct in your assumption.

NORM: Okay. The gestalt has the ability to do certain things, evidently; and I and others, as essence consciousness, we’re in a sense creating ... I am creating the experiment.

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: And my expectations, are they the thing that is going to be proven? But if the expectations are not according to the physics of reality, that won’t be shown then, will it?

ELIAS: Let me express to you that within your creation of reality and of the elements within physical reality, essence creates this physical reality. In this there exists a cooperation of consciousness to be performing within guidelines that you have created for mass, for matter, for your time continuum. Although consciousness – the links of consciousness – hold free will and may respond at times in what you consider to be irrational, they also respond in manners that you have created within your time element. Therefore, they are not as unpredictable as you may think.

NORM: So they respect the elements of our time and our mass and our general physical laws.

ELIAS: Correct; although they also move beyond these, for you have not discovered all of the elements of your sciences yet and all of the elements of your reality, for you do not take into consideration within your sciences the reality of consciousness and its free will.

NORM: Right. That is precisely the thing, precisely the idea or the concept that I want to explore in experiments. It’s frustrating to me. From the experiments that have been done, it appears that if in a previous increment of time ... time moves on. However, in a previous increment of time, after a period of time, after a time has been passed, then if something has changed that would have made their position not the correct position, then they have the opportunity to do things that they normally don’t do.

For example, in the photon experiment of John Wheeler’s idea, where the photon went through the slits and one of the slits was closed – after the photon went through the slit but before it got to the photographic plate it was closed – and the photon says, ‘I’m going to leave this particular dimension and perhaps go into a very close parallel dimension through a minor veil,’ so to speak. Am I correct in talking about minor veils? Close, probable realities?

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: It was like when I was ... you indicated earlier when I asked the question of when I was sixteen and I felt that there could have been a split, and indeed, there was another Norm Farb in a parallel dimension that became a vase artist. And of course, this goes on and on and on and on, and there’s an immense number of these close, probable realities.

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: And these particular free-will experiences that every link wants to do ... it sure has a hell of a lot of them to go through all the time! Can it see the other close, probable dimensions?


NORM: So it can look over there and say, ‘Well, I’m tired of this. It’s more fun to be over here.’ Right? Almost that way, right?

ELIAS: The links of consciousness exist simultaneously within ALL realities. (Pause)

NORM: I don’t know if I understand that, or if I did understand it I don’t know if I would believe it! But you say that one link goes through all realities?

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: Incredible!

ELIAS: They exist not merely within knowledge, but they exist within all realities simultaneously.

NORM: The original creation!

ELIAS: Therefore, it is merely the direction of its attention that creates it within matter or mass or speed within any one particular physical dimension.

NORM: Huh! It exists simultaneously in all.

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: Because there’s only now.

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: Huh! And it goes where its attention goes. Now, that’s for each link. But for example, an electron, you said, has over a million links in it. Those links are linked together consciously. Is that true?

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, in a cooperation.

NORM: In a cooperation to form an electron.

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: And to keep that electron going during this blink period for this particular dimension?

ELIAS: It is the focus of the attention, which is a cooperation in cooperation with you as essence to be materializing, that you may view within your time element.

NORM: Um-hmm. One of the questions that I wanted to ask ... it evidently is quite often true that we as focuses here, in our developments, we have an analog to true reality. How close is the analog of the wave function? The quantum mechanical wave function, being obviously steered by essence consciousness and the probability of that wave function ... and the wave function was declared to exist everywhere. Of course, that was assumed to be in this dimension, but if you integrated it over all space you would come out to a peak in a local area, and that would be where, for example, the wave function for an electron would be.

So the wave function, being that it was over all space, which now should include all dimensions, that would then mean that the links are of course over all dimensions too, over all reality, and that if you square and integrate the wave function over all space, you come up with the location where it is mostly probable. Do we steer something like this as essences, as focuses, as consciousnesses of our level of consciousness? Do we steer all of that? Is that a good analogy, this wave function idea?

ELIAS: Within THIS dimension.

NORM: Within THIS dimension it is, but there would be different wave functions or different concepts in other realities.

ELIAS: Correct; and there is no point.

NORM: There is no point. Yeah, there’s a fuzzy ...

ELIAS: There is no CENTRAL point ...

NORM: There is no central point?

ELIAS: ... of your wave function.

NORM: Huh! Mathematics – I asked you the question once, and you sure got me going! It has no meaning with essence because of the fact that – I think I may finally understand it – that you don’t need it. You’re too damned bright! Is that it?

ELIAS: It is a language.

NORM: It’s a language that you just perform automatically.

ELIAS: The function is within energy. It requires no thought.

NORM: Yeah. Well, if you wanted to, you could create whatever you wanted to and see if it worked!

ELIAS: Precisely. Mathematics is relative to physical focus.

NORM: The what is? The methods? The mathematics is.

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: Right. So is the idea, though, of the choice after something happens, the thing that I have to have as part of the experiment ... I woke up, and I’m starting to wake up like I used to in the middle of the night and things float in my mind and they materialize. I mean, the ideas come from obviously what I have been working on in my dreams, and that is true? (Elias nods) That is true. Okay.

Now, I have wanted to produce a vacuum system that will allow me to have gasses of one kind or another, either gasses that are gasses at room temperature or I could elevate the temperature and have low vapor pressure elements such as barium, and I could be using them to produce a stream of very massive fermions, complicated fermions, and the reason why I wanted to do that is for the determination of the lack of closedness of this particular dimension. Of course, if I did it with something that would condense as it hit a target rather than being evaporated again, such as any of the noble gasses or hydrogen or oxygen or nitrogen or just any of the gasses ... but the gases are easier to work with. I’ve been trying to follow your hint in regard to making it quite fluid, and so I thought of almost like a sprinkler system. The gas stream would be hitting a double gear-like thing, very lightweight, that would open and close the stream. In other words, you would see pulses of this. I woke up with that idea, and then for some reason I came up with the fact that I could put – as if this were a cylinder and the little wheels were on the inside of that – on the other side of that wheel, downstream from that, would be a closed cylinder. I got the idea that if I did this and I had another sensor on the inside of this closed system, after a period of time these particles may go into another dimension, but come back into the other closed cylinder. (Elias nods) Is that right??

ELIAS: Correct. (Grinning)

NORM: No shit! (A silent pause, and then Elias blows a puff of air at Norm, which is a ‘blow you away’ thing, and Norm starts cracking up) That’s fun! Well, let me see here.

VICKI: I don’t get it! (Elias is grinning at Norm)

NORM: What?! I mean, this is great! By the way, can you see what I’m thinking about?

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking.

NORM: Okay. Of course. You can see everything! (Laughter)

ELIAS: Not entirely! (Grinning in a very amused sort of way)

NORM: Let’s see. The timing of this ... I’m going to be working, and then the timing of this would be within minutes of returning, or seconds or microseconds, would you think? If I get down to less than a tenth of a microsecond, then the instrumentation really starts costing me a lot of money, and I would like to do it as elegantly as I can and as simply as I can, to get this thing going. Can you give me some idea of how long it would take to come back from the nearest reality?

ELIAS: There are variables within this area. This be your time element. Within your experiment, it is possible that the return may be within fractions of seconds, but it may also be within a few seconds. It shall not be within minutes, but it may vary within more than one second and fractions of a second.

NORM: The quantum mechanical barrier of this cylinder ... I imagine it as completely closed. Well, I guess you could compute it with quantum mechanics due to the thickness and the energy required to penetrate that, but that alone is quite remarkable.

ELIAS: (Grinning) They are not moving THROUGH your material.

NORM: I know! I understand, but trying to calculate this with our mathematics and our quantum mechanics is not possible then, or it’s not valid or accurate.

ELIAS: It is valid. It is merely not accurate. (Norm laughs)

NORM: Okay, okay. The equation should be changed, or the concept should be ...

ELIAS: Not necessarily. You merely affect the choice of the particles with the construction of your instrument.

NORM: Hmm! Should I have something that they like to get inside?

ELIAS: (Chuckling) They are cooperating with you ...

NORM: Should I have pictures of pretty girls inside?

ELIAS: (Laughing) This would be your choice! It matters not within consciousness! (Norm is cracking up)

NORM: Okay! But there may be something interesting for them to look at.


NORM: No. Well, why would they want to come back?

ELIAS: Within cooperation of your experimentation, and within the cooperation of consciousness to you as the observer.

NORM: The gestalt of essences that have formed this dimension and this set of multidimensions have, as you indicated I believe in the last few weeks ... I don’t want to say constraints and restrictions, but allowances and certain expectations – allowances, I guess, it’s the best word – of how this dimension is to operate, and this dimension is essentially going to start to modify those allowances as a fundamental ... like a gravitational constant, as we would think of the general theory of relativity. Is that ...

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes.

NORM: Consciousness ... for example, there are certain properties. I mean, you could have properties like color or sound, but I’m sure there are properties that I have no idea what they are, but would there be an infinite set of properties for a link?

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: Jesus! It’s beautiful, fabulous, this totality of creation! You must even have a little awe of it too, do you not?

ELIAS: It is magnificent!

NORM: It is magnificent, yes. Nice word! And that allows essences to create ANYTHING that they like ...

ELIAS: Correct.

NORM: ... any dimension, and new dimensions are being formed ...

ELIAS: Continuously.

NORM: ... continuously. Isn’t that beautiful! Are you surprised at some of them?

ELIAS: ‘Surprised’ would be inaccurate ... but within a state of wondrous amazement within becoming continuously.” [session 251, December 18, 1997]

ELIAS: “This dimension is very sexually oriented. Its foundation is sexual and emotional. Therefore, you explore all aspects and elements of these creations.

JIM: That relates to another question I had. If our dimension is focused on sexuality and emotion, what would another dimension’s focus be?

ELIAS: Differences! (Grinning)

JIM: Aggression?

ELIAS: In some. What you may imagine has been created!

JIM: Hmm! So in Star Wars and Jabba the Hut, that’s been created?

ELIAS: What you may imagine IS reality.

JIM: Some of it’s pretty bizarre! (Laughing)

ELIAS: To YOUR dimension! (Laughter) I have expressed many times, your science fiction is closer to science fact than fiction!” [session 254, January 02, 1998]

KATIE: “You had talked with Tom – in a session with him [see session 379, March 28, 1999] – about an energy exchange between he and I because of an ease in sharing energy within recognition of shared focuses, or something to that effect. I have a great deal of interaction with Tom subjectively that I’m very much aware of, and I’m really curious about a lot of it. He won’t tell me much. He’s told me some things, but I’m wondering on this business about shared focuses because I only know of four shared focuses with him, two of which were only acquaintances. Are there more that I don’t know about that perhaps are in other dimensions, or is the number of shared focuses irrelevant in this?

ELIAS: I shall express to you that at times the numbering of shared focuses is relevant and at times it is not relevant. It is dependent upon the choice of the essences and the direction that they are choosing in their movement of exploration of experiences. Now; I shall also offer to you that you do hold other focuses together, and these would be other-dimensional focuses.

Let me express to you in this that not merely your focuses within this particular dimension are affecting of you in each focus that you experience. Within essence, it matters not any distinction between physical dimensions. They are all creations and manifestations for experiences within physical dimensions. Therefore, they are all, in a manner of speaking, interchangeable. Although you do not interchange, so to speak, physically, within energy there IS an exchange that occurs within all focuses of all dimensions physically.

In this, we focus many times upon the influences of experiences and energy exchange between focuses within each dimension singularly for the reason that this holds more of an ease in your understanding.

In objective terms, you hold the ability to be translating of experiences through time elements, language elements, cultural elements, and these do not create a barrier for your objective understanding and assessment, so to speak, whereas in the introduction of energy exchanges which occur interdimensionally, there are differences which create a certain type of barrier within your understanding. Therefore, other-dimensional focuses are not referred to as often within the forum of these sessions and individuals’ questioning.

I may express to you presently that you do hold focuses within other physical dimensions with this individual, and this is also influencing as to your interconnectedness and the ease that you lend to each other within this particular focus in conjunction with this shift. But as you are aware, I also do not offer much information as to the realities of these other-dimensional focuses, for within your understanding there are barriers, for these realities are far removed from what you hold in objective recognition within this dimension.

All that you assess within your reality in this dimension – be it physical, nonphysical, within this dimension, within other physical dimensions, within consciousness, it matters not – ALL that you connect to and assess within your objective awareness in this dimension is filtered through your concepts and your reality in this dimension. Therefore, regardless of certain explanations that I offer to you in relation to elements outside of this dimension, they are translated within your thought processes into elements that you may understand.

This is, in a manner of speaking, a distortion many times, for what you evaluate and what you perceive as being a reality in relation to other areas of consciousness is a filtration through a translation of your understanding in this particular dimension. All of your reality in this dimension is relative to this dimension, in a manner of speaking, for it is all translated through your perception within this dimension.

Therefore, I express to you that you ARE quite influenced by other-dimensional focuses, not necessarily in experiences that may be translatable and relevant, so to speak, to the experiences that you hold in this dimension, but merely in the interaction and the interconnectedness and relationships that you hold within other dimensions. Are you understanding?

KATIE: Yes, I am.

ELIAS: This lends energy to you both, which may be translated into this particular physical dimension and reconstructed to be lending an ease in your exchange with each other objectively and subjectively, which lends more of an ease to each of you within your movement in connection with this shift in consciousness.” [session 428, July 20, 1999]

End Notes:

(1) Vic’s note: the new game is what is commonly termed a past-life regression, but what we call a TFE – trans-focal encounter. We’ve been facilitating each other in TFE’s for a few years now. No, we have no training, and yes, it works anyway! Our basic “method” is for the facilitator to talk the subject through a general body-relaxation process. Then we encourage the subject to connect with whatever aspect of themselves they choose, and if they allow themselves to do this, we ask questions about their experience. The operative word is “allow.” Quite often the subject feels as if they are “making it up,” which they are not, according to the dead guy!

Digests: find out more about the new game (TFEs).

Digests – see also: | absolutes | aspects of essence; an overview | choices/agreements | dimensional veils | distortion | energy exchanges; Elias, Paul (Patel) | essence; an overview | extraterrestrials | focus of essence; an overview | forum | information | links of consciouness | objective/subjective awareness | perception | probabilities | Regional Area 1 | sexuality and emotion | shift in consciousness | simultaneous time | time frameworks |

[ Go to the top ]

The Elias Transcripts are held in © copyright 1995 – 2024 by Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.

© copyright 1997 – 2024 by Paul M. Helfrich, All Rights Reserved. | Comments to: