the Elias forum: Explore the transcript archive.










Sunday, January 12, 1997

<  Session 147 (Group/Castaic)  >

“Unofficial Information/Body Consciousness”

Participants: Mary (Michael), Vicki (Lawrence), Ron (Olivia), Cathy (Shynla), Gail (William), Jene (Rudy), Jim (Yarr), Norm (Stephen), Reta (Dehl), Cecelia (Sari), Drew (Matthew), and two new individuals, Frank (Sander), and Carole (Aileen).

Vic’s note: Carole will be written as Carol in the transcript. (1) Also, Elias was extremely intense throughout this session.

Elias arrives at 6:44 PM. (Time was twenty-five seconds.)

ELIAS: Good evening. Welcome to new essences this evening. We shall dispense with formalities; allowing Aileen for one, Sander for other. (Indicating Carole and Frank. Spelling was given for Aileen)

This evening, we shall be discussing unofficial information. You each experience recently thoughts and emotions that you do not understand. Your dream activity may be unusual, and you do not quite fit your experience to your understanding. Your teachers previous to this present now have offered you information in some directions, and in directions dealing with your body consciousness to a limited extent. We shall be expanding on these ideas, concepts, what have you. They are realities, but for you they are concepts.

Many of you experience confusion recently, for you do not understand your experiences. Unofficial information is that information that is reality, but does not fit within the guidelines of your framework of reality that you accept. There are many experiences that do not fit into your framework. This is not to say that they are not reality, for they are. You only do not accept these experiences as reality, for you have taught yourselves and have been taught through the ages and through your focuses that this information is not real. You have made distinctions in allowing for what you now term, and have termed for much of your time period, as imagination.

I have offered information recently to you that you have not accepted as of this point. You do not understand. You do not recognize your own belief systems. Therefore, you do not accept information offered. I have expressed to you that the information that has been offered shall be boat-rocking. You do not see this, for you do not identify your own belief systems. You view certain belief systems and identify them. For the most part, you view your reality and express, “It is. It is not a belief system, it merely is.” Every thought you think is filtered through belief systems. You are physically focused and this is your creation. Your experiences are not always filtered through your belief systems. Therefore, they do not fit. You discount these experiences and do not accept them, for they are unofficial.

I have begun to express to you elements of body consciousness. I have expressed to you from early on in our session times that your physical expression, your body, is not a vessel! It is a tangible, physical matter expression of essence. It is you. It holds its own consciousness, for each cell holds its own independent consciousness. Each atom holds its own individual consciousness. Within cooperation, it creates a collective consciousness which becomes your body consciousness. You, as a focus of essence, hold consciousness beyond the physical manifestation of body consciousness, but are intimately involved with this consciousness. You direct the consciousness and function of your physical expression; your body. (2)

You are not another focus, but you may experience another focus. Another focus holds a body consciousness of its own, but you may experience an exchange and you may experience another focus in its totality. You may merge totally to another focus and experience another focus, as it may do likewise also.

I have also expressed that you intersect alternate selves. I have expressed that you may exchange with alternate selves. You may accomplish a certain time period within a focus and you may exchange with an alternate self, which shall continue the focus as you continue otherwise. How is this possible if your body consciousness is only your body consciousness? Here we come to unofficial information.

You view yourselves as one entity. You view yourselves as one mind, one body. You are not! You view your consciousness as one thinking mind, one thought process. You are countless thought processes. Each focus is not one entity. The air within this room occupies one space. It is not one entity. In like manner, you focus within one material expression physically, but your consciousness is not singular. Your physical body expression resonates to the tone of you, of one focus; not to the entirety of essence, but to the individual focus; for each focus is a new creation. It has been always, but it is new. We do not deal with used material!

Your body consciousness recognizes your beingness. Your body consciousness also recognizes that your focus beingness is an aspect of your essence and will also identify with all other aspects of essence. Therefore, within essence you may exchange temporarily between focuses.

Each focus is as the air within this room; myriads of aspects, countless elements of personality cooperating to create one focus. This allows for all of your alternate selves. These may exchange with an individual focus. However, another focus may not exchange with you. You may temporarily intersect and experience, but you may not “take over.”

You have asked much time ago of your concept of walk-ins; another entity which “walks into you,” therefore assuming your physical expression and continuing for you as you dissipate into the cosmos! Which, we do not know of where you shall be dissipating to, but the new entity shall be “taking over” your physical form. This does not happen! Underline! You may not assume another focus, for it is not you, although it is you! (Confused laughter) You may temporarily intersect, merge, experience another focus, just as they may temporarily merge with you and experience. In this mergence, you are unaware of this presence. You do not lose you, as they do not lose themselves.

If you are exchanging with another focus, you may merge into the experience of another focus. You may empathically be another focus. Aspects of your focus shall merge. This in reality you may consider, in your terms, a physical act. Your consciousness shall merge into this other individual. They may feel odd or strangely, but they also will continue to feel themselves. You shall hold an awareness, as if you are this focus. This may occur temporarily. You may not assume another focus. As you are all focuses of one essence, mergences may occur. The tone is close enough, in your terms, that each individual body consciousness shall temporarily be accepting of this mergence; temporarily.

Alternate selves hold almost entirely the same tone as what you understand of yourself. That self which you identify as you has countless alternate selves which are also you. You only identify one you, but just as you identify one air within one space, there are myriads of particles that are making up of this space. These alternates may exchange places with you, in your terms, for their tone will not be interrupting of your body consciousness. Another essence merging with you will be recognized by your body consciousness; and has been stated previously, your physical response within your body, to placing what you term to be foreign objects within it, shall be rejection. Your body and its consciousness holds its own awareness and responds to you.

This is not to say that an exchange with another essence may not occur ... obviously! (Laughter) Within agreement, an exchange may occur with another essence, but the body consciousness recognizes this exchange and is partially rejecting of this exchange. Physical elements occur, for the body consciousness realizes the essence occupying and directing ... We shall more express directing, for the essence does not float in and float out! But the body is recognizing of the direction and tone, which is different. Therefore, its response is to be rejecting of this. It will not reject alternates. It will not reject temporary exchange of other focuses of essence. It will be rejecting of another essence exchange. (This must be why Mary experiences unexplainable physical symptoms and affectingness) This is part of unofficial information. In all of its aspects, you may experience exchange or intersection with alternates or with another focus, and you may experience emotional changes, thought changes, action changes, that you do not understand. They shall be temporary, in your view, but you shall notice.

I have expressed to you that you do not reincarnate. Each focus is of itself a new creation, independent within personality. You have not been manifest over and over and over again, but you have been always; for outside of your present recognized reality, there is no time frame as you understand it. Therefore, what was, is. You are then as you are now also. If you are thinking of your individual focus and you are thinking of these air particles, that you are not one entity, you may allow yourself a clearer understanding of the diversity of self. Just as particles do not communicate through time in faster than light speed but know within them, so are you also. Subjectively, you are aware, to a point, of your other focuses. They do not all occupy the same time framework as you, but they all occur now. Therefore, as you are Seer, you are this now, and you are also presently Seer within what you consider the beginning of your physical manifestation now. (Pause)

This air particle I have caught (grabbing air with one hand) is now this air particle (grabbing air with other hand) is now they are air. They do not occupy the same space. They are simultaneous. They are both air. They are both the same, as are you within your focuses.

There was no entity in some “beginning” which has created essence. Essence is not a contained entity. Some “thing” did not create other “things” which creates other “things.” All is consciousness. I may be instructing of Lawrence to be capitalizing of all objects! (3) Therefore, we shall emphasize the divinity and importance of all consciousness and manifestation and creation, for they are inseparable. They also are all the same. They only choose different arrangements. Essence is a term that is used for your benefit; for your understanding of identification of a tone of consciousness which holds a certain direction, a certain intent for its creation of manifestation. All consciousness holds intent within its own value fulfillment. Essence is that tone which chooses manifestation within personality for certain experiences. This is you. All other manifestations hold consciousness and are aware of self and hold the intent of value fulfillment, even to the tiniest link of consciousness; and together, all of this is the action of The Creating Universal One And Whole, which is not an entity or being. It is an action. It is a movement.

We shall break. You may ask your questions shortly.

BREAK 7:22 PM.
RESUME 7:33 PM. (Time was five seconds.)

ELIAS: Unofficial information: Where do I go when I am dead? I do not remanifest within the guidelines of reincarnation. Where shall I be? (To Vicki) Where are Lydia and Tweety??? (Grinning)

VICKI: Yeah! (Much laughter)

ELIAS: As you move through consciousness and you move into the area of transition, many events occur. You also continue, as always, to be making choices. Within these choices you may choose to be remanifesting, although you do not remanifest, for each focus is a new creation! This is contradictory information, but it is not.

You may choose to be remanifesting and you may accomplish this in many different directions. You may choose to be remanifesting an aspect of yourself, as you identify yourself. Or, you may be choosing to be interacting with another focus or another essence and you may together remanifest a combination of aspects, which shall be you but shall not be you, for it shall be its own new creation. You may fragment and you may allow this fragment to remanifest, which is you but is not you; for all aspects, all fragments, all focuses contain all of essence. You are all of essence. You are a focus of essence. You are as the air is. You may not differentiate. But, what has happened to you? The new manifestation has been created, and where have you gone? For you do not disintegrate! Energy is not annihilated. Therefore, you continue. This is your choice as to which direction you move into.

I presented to you early within our session time that you are manifest and you are not manifest simultaneously. Catherine was expressing to this essence in a manner to be cunning, and attempting to be manipulating within information to be “tripping up.” It was explained to you then that you may remanifest and be not remanifest simultaneously, for this is truth. In your questioning of “Has my father remanifest?” and in answering “Yes, this now is a small child within another location,” this is true; but the focus in its entirety has not remanifest, for the personality continues non-physically and chooses its new direction. The aspect of the focus which desires to be remanifest is remanifest, and there is created a new personality and slightly different tone.

You, as you view yourself, may choose to remain within transition for what you think of as a time period, although there is no time period; or you, as you think of you, may choose any direction that you may possibly imagine. It is your choice. There are no closed systems. There are no limitations. Therefore, whatever you desire, you shall move into this direction and you shall move into this area of consciousness. Therefore, I may not express to you a precise location of yourself or of Lydia, for it is your choice of which direction you choose to move within; but you shall choose to be incorporating movement, and you shall continue becoming non-physically.

I shall address also briefly a concern of manifestation of physical form upon this, quotations, “physical plane,” with all of its motors! Within physical focus presently, you tend to view yourselves as “less than.” You lean in the direction of viewing yourselves as “lower than, less intelligent than, less evolved than, less creative than.” You may fill in your blanks! This is incorrect. I may express to you this evening that there are essences that do not possess the experience that you possess, for it has been their choice to not be physically manifest within any dimension. Therefore, they lack this experience. Within consciousness, they assume the experience from those that experience, but within their choice individually, they do not possess the experience and the understanding of the experience.

Those which you view to be “great masters,” which occupy the areas of consciousness that you view to be far removed from yourself and so knowledgeable, may possess knowledge of universes, but do not possess the understanding of your emotional experience. Those that you view to be “ascended masters” possess much knowledge that you do not, but you also possess much knowledge that they do not. Therefore, you are the same. You are all, we are all, within a state of becoming. There is never a completion. Therefore, there is never an ending point or an area of consciousness that you shall know all, for as you approach knowing all, you shall realize there is more; as you realize presently that the more that you acquire within knowledge, the more knowledge is available to you. Now you may ask your questions.

VICKI: I have a question. So if it’s your choice which direction you choose to go in after completing the action of transition, couldn’t one of those choice be that you would choose to remanifest with the same personality?

ELIAS: No, not entirely; for this would not be a new creation and you would be re-experiencing physical focus, which you have already accomplished.

VICKI: So you would always choose a new experience.

ELIAS: Correct. Within the choosing of a new experience, to your way of thinking, you may not view this entirely as a new experience; just as within physical focus you may experience certain actions over and over. Each action shall be slightly different, but you shall view the actions to be the same. This is what you term to be creating of your patterns. Within non-physical focus also, you may choose very similar actions, but they shall always bear different aspects to them. You shall hold an awareness of the difference non-physically more clearly than you hold within physical focus; although within physical focus you may choose to be more aware, and you may allow yourself the awareness to differentiate within your patterns and your experiences presently. You are experiencing remanifestation by remanifesting an aspect of self.

You think in terms of self. This is the entirety of self! (Indicating the body) This is my aspect! (Holding up one finger) I shall cut off this aspect and it shall remanifest into this again! No! This is aspect! (Indicating the body) It is aspect. It is alternate. It is you. It is essence! Therefore, in remanifestation of the aspect of self you are remanifesting, just as within the description of Lydia; but you also continue. I have expressed to you repeatedly, you are not one singular entity! You are countless units of consciousness, holding a tone.

Think to yourself once again of your particle spray. Contained within the particle are all of the particles that emerge. Although it is one particle, it may produce hundreds within its spray. It was one. They are not pieces of the particle. They are new particles, but they are the one.

These are difficult concepts, which I am understanding of this; but you choose to ask! Therefore, you are offered the information.

NORM: Can I ask a question?

ELIAS: You may.

NORM: The action of the essence, with regard to the aspect remanifesting, can I consider that, to clarify my thinking on this, is that an act of creation of a separate but together essence, a new personality? It is a new personality ...

ELIAS: It is a new personality. It is not necessarily a new essence. It may be, if it is chosen to be fragmented. If it is not chosen to be fragmented, it will not be a new essence. It will be a new focus of essence. This also is not a sequential action. It is simultaneous.

CELIA: I have a question. In terms of when you say now, you refer to ... we’re speaking of time and knowing that time does not really exist as we’ve learned to keep track of time here. So you’re speaking of now. So is now then the same as always?

ELIAS: Within a definition non-physically, yes. Within a definition physically, no; for you recognize time. You have created this dimension of time, this element. Each physical focus creates its own definition of time, its own rate of time. These are relative only to the individual physical focus, but within that particular physical focus, it is a reality.

CELIA: But for essence, going beyond physical focus, for our essence being present now ... If I’m understanding, we are present now as this physical focus, but our essence was always.

ELIAS: Correct. Within essence non-physically, within consciousness, now is always, now being eternal; no beginning, no ending, no before, no after. All is now.

CELIA: And that’s what essence is then.

ELIAS: Essence is within this now.

RETA: I have a question. You were talking about an essence, and they send down all these focuses or whatever. Is there ever a time when this particular essence gathers all this, comes back together, all the focuses are finished with manifestation and have the experiences, bring it all together and combine it again? We’re saying now we’ve done all this, we’ve had this experience. Do we go on to anything further and greater, in a manner of speaking? Get out of transition? Do you ever bring yourself back together as a whole essence?

ELIAS: We have discussed this previously, and I shall explain once again. You are not fragmented, in your terminology, at this point, and you are not “absorbing back into” the whole, for you are the whole at every moment. Therefore, it is only differentiated by dimension and attention. Yes, you may choose within essence to not be incorporating physical focus within your essence, but you are not calling back all of your children to your house to be collectively reunited! Within essence, you may choose to be entering the cycle of physical manifestation, and you may experience this by designating focuses within dimensions of physical manifestation. You may also choose to disengage the cycle of physical manifestation. In this, you may choose what you think of as completeness of non-physical focus.

These are extremely simplified terms. I shall be reminding you that as your understanding increases, I shall offer information futurely that shall appear, once again, contradictory; for I shall express to you that you shall hold physical manifestations as you are completely, non-physically, subjectively focused. We shall not enter this area presently, for this will serve only for confusion; but within simultaneous time, all things are at once. It is not a created situation of experiencing a cycle of manifestation within given physical dimensions and moving forward linearly, and then, underline, moving out of physical focus and manifesting subjectively entirely. All is simultaneous. Therefore, it is all incorporated always.

You may be, you are not, but you may be an essence choosing not to be engaging any physical manifestation within any dimension, and you shall not experience this type of objective reality. Therefore, you shall be all gathered continuously, with no fingers spreading out into different dimensions which need be pulled back and retracted into essence! You shall move into areas of non-physical and physical manifestation both, simultaneously.

Some essences also are choosing to be continuing within manifestation physically; this being their choice, for this being their desire; wishing to be continually engaging physical manifestation. This is not a lower plane, underline once again, of existence within consciousness. It is different. It is a choice. All avenues within consciousness are a choice of experience in the action of becoming.

NORM: We, all of us, our filtering system is based upon the three dimensions that we have here, and time. The discussion that you had for a half hour before the break was extremely difficult to interpret because of the filtering system that I have, and I’m sure that many of the rest of us do, but you have the capability of thinking this way consciously, and I’m trying to have some idea of how I can think like you think! (Laughter) In regard to there is a becoming, there is action, are there a set of dimensions that you can talk about? There is some separateness. There is a lot of togetherness. I’d love to be able to amalgamate the action; becoming, separateness, togetherness. Is that how you think??? Please help! (Much laughter) I read before that Seth said that action and creativity are the two dimensions of true reality. Is that how I should be thinking?

ELIAS: This was an illustration. There are many dimensions to reality. All of them are reality. All of consciousness is reality. All of creativity and creation is reality in its innumerable forms, or lack of form.

What you view within this phenomenon is also a filtration through layers of consciousness; a translation of no language; a translation of energy and knowing into objective language and speech patterns. You filter through belief systems and thought processes that you attach belief systems to. You may widen this by accepting the belief systems that you hold. You first must identify the belief systems that you hold; for you all hold belief systems, and you all hold concepts that you do not hold belief systems! As you identify and understand that although you think you believe certain concepts, you believe contrary, you shall allow yourself to widen by acceptance of these belief systems. In this, you shall allow yourself the opportunity to be actualizing your reality more efficiently. In this, you may compare that you may begin thinking as I am thinking; for the only difference is that I am remembering, and I understand what I remember. You do not remember.

NORM: That’s the truth!

CAROL: Elias, I had an experience that sounds similar to what Reta was describing before, whereby I was doing an exercise to get out of my physical consciousness, expand my consciousness, and while I did this I sort of felt a physical movement and went to a place in consciousness where I could experience what felt like a coming together of all of my lifetimes all at once, and it felt like all time was existing all at once and yet no time was existing all at once. It was very powerful for me to experience this and it made me weep, and I just couldn’t stop weeping because I felt like I know who I am, and I felt this incredible understanding and expansion, and it was awesome. It was astounding! It was like becoming awake, finally.

ELIAS: This is an incorporation of a remembrance. This is an identification of self; an understanding, if allowed, that you are, within each individual focus, the entirety of essence; that although manifest within one individual focus, within one individual personality tone, you are also the entirety of essence. Therefore, you hold the ability to be intersecting all aspects of essence. You also hold all knowledge of essence. You have allowed yourself the opportunity to be viewing a remembrance of essence, which is an opening of what we have spoken previously of within neurological physical pathways. This opening allows you an identification that you are more than you view.

This also is unofficial information, but you have allowed yourself to be accepting of this unofficial information and recognizing that this is all of you. This may be quite overwhelming at the moment of what you may describe as impact, for you shall experience instantaneously all of essence. A quite normal expected physical response would be weeping; not within identification of sadness, and not also within an identification emotionally of joy, but of knowing and identifying the overwhelming beingness of self. You view these things in terms of large, big, huge. View yourselves as this, for you are greater than your imagination may objectify to you.

In this, this is becoming a more common experience; not identified entirely in this same manner, but many, many individuals shall be experiencing the beginnings of a remembrance, of which we have spoken previously. In this, you are allowing yourselves to identify with your own language, your own communication with essence, your own identification with self, which is to your way of thinking unimaginably immense; and this is you. You are multidimensional and you are exceedingly diverse, and ultimately and immaculately creative. Other individuals experience emotional occurrences in a beginning of remembrances. These shall continue, as you are presently engaged within the beginnings of the action of your shift.

VICKI: Great! (Whispering, and not meant to be heard)

ELIAS: You shall not view entirely uncomfortably continuously, as you learn to be accepting of self and self-expression and that the expression of self is not “bad” and is always acceptable! I shall break for Michael, and you may continue with your questioning.

BREAK 8:26 PM.
RESUME 8:41 PM. (No time noted, as the tape didn’t start immediately)

ELIAS: Matthew! Has the answer to your question become clearer?

DREW: Yes, with a new question! You stated, when we talked last week, that quite often what we think we believe is not actually a belief in a belief, but a belief in the concept of a belief. I’d like to know, when can we trust that what we think we believe is in fact a belief in the belief, and not a belief in the concept of the belief? (Whew!) At what point can we trust that the belief is real, and not just wishful thinking?

ELIAS: When you experience no conflict. When you experience no confusion. When you understand the belief system, and when you incorporate the actualization in reality of this belief. Those belief systems that you accept, you experience no conflict. These sometimes you view as belief systems that “work for you.” You incorporate no conflict. You incorporate no confusion. You may also identify these as belief systems, but you hold no conflict. Others you do not comply with, but you accept and recognize as belief systems and hold no conflict, and when presented with the belief system in any, any, underline, aspect, will hold no conflict. This is an acceptance. This you may trust.

DREW: Then can you address those belief systems that we have which create conflict in our lives?

ELIAS: (Humorously) Our time frame presently is what? (Laughter) We shall be numbering for hours within this particular session if I am expressing of those belief systems which are causing you conflict! Many of your belief systems are causing you conflict, for you may accept or think you accept part of a belief system, but only within certain guidelines and certain applications. You may allow certain belief systems for others, and you may not allow for yourself. You may allow certain belief systems for self, and not allow for others. Your belief systems are quite intricate. They are also quite creative and extensive, and have many variations. When you hold no conflict at all, you shall have accepted a belief system. When you hold no doubt in any aspect, you shall have accepted a belief system.

You may express to yourselves repeatedly that you accept the concept that you create your reality. You will also accept this limitedly, for you shall find areas and aspects of your reality that you do not accept that you create. Every moment of your existence within physical focus, within any focus, you create. Every experience that you experience, you create.

These are concepts. You accept the concept; as within your religious focus, for many centuries you accepted the concept of your father god. You did not accept the reality, although it is not a reality, but you accepted the concept. You do not accept the reality of this concept, which is a reality!

You do not accept many realities that are truth, for you do not understand. As I have stated previously, truth within your focus is inconsequential. Your belief systems are consequential. You do not rule your lives by truth, although you think you do! But I shall venture to express that I know not any individual that rules their life and their focus by color vibration! I know not any individual physically focused that directs the entirety of their life within the truth of tone! These are truths. They are, within physical focus, inconsequential. Your belief systems are your gauge. Your belief systems, once again, are not bad; are not wrong. They are.

DREW: What if they’re destructive?

ELIAS: They are not destructive. It is your perception that you believe they are destructive; for within the moment, you do not see the entirety of the probabilities that you move into. Therefore, you may view certain experiences based on certain belief systems as destructive, but all experiences are a movement through probabilities and are not negative, and are not destructive, and are purposeful. It is your perception that they are destructive or negative; this being why you draw yourself to this forum; to understand and widen this perception, and engage your periphery. In this, you may learn to see more of your picture within your probabilities, as opposed to only each individual probability as you choose it; for within itself, one probability is only one probability; a small piece of the entirety of the puzzle. (Pause) Yo ho, Yarr!

JIM: Yo ho! Good evening!

ELIAS: And within the discussion of probabilities, how view you the probabilities at this present now?

JIM: Very creative. I’m seeing the creation that goes into them, and just trying to stay open to probabilities coming forward, and I realize that there are choices within those that are presented.

ELIAS: Even the obscure!

JIM: Yes, very much so, when you can find the obscure, but I seem to make the obscure obscure very creatively sometimes!

ELIAS: And how fares your shoulder presently?

JIM: It phases in and out. It’s not as intense actually this week as it has been previously.

ELIAS: Within this present moment?

JIM: It’s very, very mild. It exists, but I think because I just drew attention to it. But previously, I hadn’t thought of it.

ELIAS: And you may notice an alleviation of foot also.

JIM: With the probabilities that are being presented within other areas, working with other individuals within our group. Interesting. It’s just so darn connected! It just amazes me more and more!

ELIAS: And I shall extend to Aileen that if you are wishing audience, you may inquire and I shall be obliging.

CAROL: Thank you, Elias.

ELIAS: And we shall be engaging our game, much to William’s dismay! (Chuckling) For you are needing of your practicing of subjective interaction, and noticing of your impressions, and connecting with your information of your game and your families and your selves. That word again! It always returns! Self, self, self! (Laughter)

RETA: Well, I have a couple, it you want me to begin.

ELIAS: You may.

RON: Can I switch tapes real quick first? (Tape change)

RETA: I’m still trying to put together my family. I’m starting at the higher level, and eventually we’ll get to the children. My son Joe, Sumafi and aligned with Borledim?

ELIAS: You are entering this for the game?

RETA: Not good?

ELIAS: Are you wishing to be entering this for the game?

RETA: Yes sir.

ELIAS: Less probable.

RETA: Oh boy! My son-in-law Jeff, who lives near San Francisco, essence Gramada, aligned with Milumet?

ELIAS: Less probable.

RETA: Oh god! My daughter Karen, Sumari essence? (Elias nods) I got one! Whew! My son Paul, he’s the hardest one for me to figure out or think about. He flips back and forth between several essences. Is he Ilda?

ELIAS: Less probable.

RETA: Sumari? Is he Sumari?

ELIAS: Acceptable.

RETA: Can you say ... Oh, never mind. My daughter Susan, I guess before she was aligned with Milumet and I thought she was Sumari, and you said no. And yet she’s the artistic type. Did I hear you wrong?

ELIAS: It has been expressed that there are basic qualities aligned with each family, but each family is not contained to these qualities. All essence families incorporate all expressions.

RETA: Oh, yes. But there’s generally a main one essence. I can’t imagine. Okay, my son Steven, Sumari?

ELIAS: Acceptable.

RETA: Good. My daughter-in-law Rose, Borledim?

ELIAS: Less probable.

RETA: I give up. Thank you.

RON: I’ll go. I have some new ones!

ELIAS: Ah! Very good, Olivia! (Much laughter)

RON: I want to apologize for that. I was somebody else that night!

ELIAS: It was obviously an intersection of another focus assuming your physical form temporarily and offering previously offered game connections! Quite understandable! (Cracking up here)

RON: Okay, in mass events, with Milumet, The Great Flood.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

RON: In fables, with Gramada, Androcles And The Lion.

ELIAS: (Accessing) Less probable. Inventive attempt!

RON: Okay. Titles as concepts, with Milumet, The Lost Horizon.

ELIAS: One point.

RON: Children’s stories, with Zuli, Thumbelina.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

RON: Quotes, with Sumari, “It will always be now.” (Much laughter)

ELIAS: Examine essence family!

RON: Okay. Mass events, with Vold, time.

ELIAS: Less probable.

RON: Okay. I have more!

ELIAS: Shall we be expressing, Olivia is “on a roll?”

RON: Not if I don’t get one more! Rituals, with Tumold, prayer.

ELIAS: Continue!

RON: Children’s stories, with Tumold, Tom Thumb.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

CATHY: Gemstone, orange, Malachite.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

CATHY: Blue, fruit, strawberry.

ELIAS: Less probable.

CATHY: With the babies, Oliver, with Twylah, Germany.

ELIAS: Quite close, Shynla!

CATHY: I’ll say Austria, and then I’ll shut up if it’s not that!

ELIAS: Still quite close!

CATHY: I’m certainly not gonna guess! Far be it from me to guess! (Laughing) Would the baby with Sumari be Burton Lee?

ELIAS: Less probable.

CATHY: Leeward? (Elias shakes his head) I’m done!

GAIL: Direction, within, Sumafi.

ELIAS: Less probable.

GAIL: Direction, east, Milumet.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

GAIL: Religion, Scientology, Tumold.

ELIAS: Less probable.

GAIL: Titles as concepts, To Kill A Mockingbird, Vold.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

GAIL: And with the baby, with Lee, Andrew, Drew for short, Sumari.

ELIAS: Less probable!

GAIL: Man! You better be right, Yarr!

JIM: Okay, the same thing with the babies, Tao Lee.

ELIAS: Less probable!

JIM: Spiritual leaders, Sumafi, The Dalai Lama.

ELIAS: Less probable.

JENE: I have a couple. Scary thought, isn’t it?

ELIAS: (Grinning) Attempting within the framework of our categories established, I assume!

JENE: You assume! I can’t establish a new one???

ELIAS: You may, if designating this!

JENE: Physical pleasures, with Sumari ...

ELIAS: Ah, very good!

JENE: How ‘bout that! ... working.

ELIAS: One point. (Congrats, Jene!)

JENE: Yes! (Laughter) Spiritual leaders, Sumafi, Deepak Chopra.

ELIAS: Less probable.

JENE: Hmmm. Interesting.

ELIAS: Examine category.

JENE: How about ... Never mind. I won’t say that out loud. Is that impression correct? (Laughing)

ELIAS: Continue!

JENE: For new essence; Frank, Gramada aligned with Sumari.

ELIAS: Less probable. (To Frank) You may be assessing the essence families and identify yourself as to your alignment within these, if you are choosing.

FRANK: How do I do that? (The group offers to help)

VICKI: Okay. For Michael; Sumafi, natural disasters, The Ice Age.

ELIAS: (Accessing) Less probable. Examine family.

VICKI: Sumari, religion, Gnostics.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

VICKI: Zuli, mass events, the creation of the Olympics.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

VICKI: Ilda, mass events, the space program.

ELIAS: Less probable.

VICKI: Milumet, philosophers, Hegel.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

VICKI: Vold, artists, I don’t have a clue how to pronounce this. It’s spelled G-A-U-G-U-I-N.

ELIAS: One point.

VICKI: That would be it for Michael. For myself; in vibrational tones and connecting essence families, I’d like to connect the Vold family and the Borledim family with a sunrise.

ELIAS: One point. Very good, Lawrence! There be your sunrise!

JENE: Finally!

VICKI: Also with Vold, in mass events, the French Revolution.

ELIAS: Less probable.

VICKI: Fables, with Gramada, The Lion And The Mouse.

ELIAS: Less probable.

VICKI: Fables, with Zuli, Androcles and the Lion.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

VICKI: Poets, with Sumari, Emerson.

ELIAS: Acceptable.

VICKI: Poets, with Ilda, Wordsworth.

ELIAS: Less probable.

VICKI: Flowers, with Zuli, Lily.

ELIAS: Specify.

VICKI: I don’t have a specification. The white ones.

GAIL: Well, there’s two kinds of white ones. (Various suggestions are made by the group here)

VICKI: I can see it in my head, but I don’t know what it’s called. I don’t know the name. It’s the big white one. I don’t have the proper word. It was a picture in my head. I’ll look it up!

ELIAS: Acceptable.

VICKI: That’s it for me, but to offer a game question for another individual, for Simon, I would like to offer that the baby’s name connected with Sumari is Leland.

ELIAS: Less probable.

CATHY: I have a game question for Jo. She would like to know if Ed is aligned with the Ilda family.

ELIAS: Less probable.

CATHY: She would like to know if Ed’s intent name is “To Serve.”

ELIAS: This would be his choice! As to intent names ...

CATHY: Isn’t that funny how she brought that up, and she hasn’t been here!

GAIL: Actually, I’ve been thinking of one that seems to keep going across my mind. It’s “Rainbow Connector.”

ELIAS: This being your identification of self?

GAIL: I don’t know exactly what it is, but it’s there.

ELIAS: Know within you that your name that you give yourself as your intent name is your identification and expression of you.

GAIL: I feel that I do that, and I’ve always done that, so I feel that it is an expression of me, to connect with all different people.

ELIAS: Then you may hold this name, if this is what you identify as you.

GAIL: I choose to.

ELIAS: Very well.

NORM: I have a couple more questions, one in regard to flowers; the lily family, cabeza negro, residing in Mexico, with the Tumold?

ELIAS: (Accessing) Less probable for family.

NORM: How about gemstone, black onyx with Sumafi?

ELIAS: Less probable.

GAIL: The last few weeks, I’ve experienced picking up feelings from other people that I know are not mine. Is this somewhat what you were describing at the beginning of our session ?

ELIAS: Partially. Partially, no; for you incorporate a beginning of a remembrance in which you shall identify feelings slightly yourself that are unfamiliar, and these shall be incorporated within your remembrance. But as I expressed to you at our last meeting, much of what you experience presently is an empathic sense and identification with other individuals who are engaging a remembrance. Lanyah is actively engaging a remembrance, and you empathically are connecting with this experience. This may be confusing, for you may assume the remembrance for yourself, which it is not. Are you understanding?

GAIL: Yes.

ELIAS: Presently, you incorporate a slight activity in remembrance, although your attention is diverted in many other areas, not allowing for a remembrance presently in greater volume; but you do connect empathically with others which are engaged within the action of a more accelerated remembrance, although they do not understand what they are accomplishing.

GAIL: So when they are in a remembrance and are having an emotion, I pick up that emotion and want to express it?

ELIAS: Correct. You may also at times misinterpret that you may be incorporating the remembrance, when in actuality the individual that you are empathically connecting with is holding the action of the remembrance.

GAIL: Actually, I feel that belongs to that person because those aren’t my feelings. When I get emotional, they’re different. When Mary was getting emotional I picked up how she was feeling so I knew it wasn’t mine, but I didn’t know where she was going because she was just going and I was going with her, and I tried to suppress the emotion instead of allowing it to be expressed.

ELIAS: But you are engaging the empathic act more. In this, you may confuse yourself at times, in bringing the empathic experience to yourself and holding a residual of this which shall be interpreted as a remembrance, which you shall identify as your own, which may be confusing; this being why I have offered to you that these remembrances are not your remembrances. Therefore, if you are experiencing an extreme remembrance vividly, you shall identify that this is a residual of an empathic action and is not your remembrance.

GAIL: Like the one that Norm was describing with the barbed wire around the building? I really went into that one. I knew that wasn’t mine. I was just picking that up. That one I didn’t like!

ELIAS: Correct. Understand that these are not your remembrances, and as they are incorporated or connected to, they are not hurtful.

GAIL: Scary, some of them!

ELIAS: Allow yourself the opportunity to view experiences as experiences. Those which are not your experiences, so to speak, experiment and practice with, allowing yourself the opportunity to view these experiences without the judgmental belief systems of fearfulness, good, bad, right, wrong. This will be helpful in the incorporation of your own experiences, and the acceptance of these.

GAIL: Okay. Thank you.

VICKI: I have a question. I received a communication this week from Jessele, who asked a question that seems to be in alignment with the subject matter tonight, regarding essence names or tones. In this individual’s experience she has been called different names or tones by different entities or essences, and wonders if it could be that we have a different name within every dimension and perhaps in every focus in each dimension, and also wonders if the essence name relates at all to the essence family.

ELIAS: You do not hold a different tone of essence. You may change the tone that you identify with within essence, which you do not venture to do often, but you do not hold different essence names within different dimensions, although you incorporate different languages within different dimensions. Therefore, it may appear that you hold different names, for you are using words. The tone remains the same.

As has been expressed, each focus holds its own tone which is in alignment with essence. It is the essence tone, but holding its own individual, very slight variation, which is a differentiation of personality. Overall, if you were within physical focus to play a chord upon your musical instrument, you would hear the sound of the chord together; one tone, although incorporating many notes. You may also very slightly alter the tone of this one chord, and to your hearing you may not recognize the alteration. The tone shall be so slightly different that it shall appear to be the same within your recognition, but there is a very slight difference which incorporates the variation of tone within the totality of tone of essence, which allows for individual personality and uniqueness.

You may be offered different essence names by different individuals. This should not present a disturbance to you if you are understanding that you are requesting a word. You are requesting what you identify as a name. This is a translation. It is not the same as the tone. It is the closest translation within your language. Therefore, within a different dimension it may be connected to with a different word. It is dependent upon the focus of the essence exchanging, as to which area it shall connect to. Some essences, within exchange in this manner, may limit their availability of connections of physical focuses. Therefore, they shall offer information that they may connect to and legitimately offer you a word within whatever language being expressed, but it is a translation; this being why I have expressed to you all, from the onset of our sessions, these are unimportant. They are only for your benefit of identification and curiosity within physical focus.

As to their significance in meaning, they mean nothing. They are not significant. What is significant is the tone, which may not be translated fully, identically, or purely into a language. Therefore, you are given a close approximation within translation. This may vary with different translations. As has been stated, it is uncommon to be changing of your tone. It occurs, but it is not common.

Your tone is not determined by essence families. Essence families do not determine any element of you. You move to an essence family in identification of like intent. You are not pulled or created into or born into or manufactured from essence families. This is a magnating to of like intent, and a sharing of. The alignment of essence families changes. Therefore, this has no bearing upon your individual tone, for you change your alignment with essence families as you wish. In this, there is no designation of tone created by essence families. Now; you shall, within tone, magnate to like tone, which magnates to like intent. Therefore, many essences within an individual essence family shall hold similar tone, but it is not a rule.

CAROL: Is tone connected with feeling? What exactly is tone?

ELIAS: Within a translation of physical focus, of this dimension of physical focus, you may interpret tones as being related to feelings, although they are not; for there is no adequate translation within any physical focus of essence tone, for these elements of truths non-physical are non-translatable into physical focus, just as the entirety of a Source Event is not translatable into physical focus; but within translation, a close approximation would be your identification of feeling.

CAROL: Can we, though, intuit other people’s tones?

ELIAS: Within your translation within physical focus, yes; and you shall also at times be recognizing of this, and know. It is not impossible for you to identify a commonality in tone with another individual. Although you may not understand what you identify objectively, you shall be drawn to this within a recognition.

CAROL: So the outer manifestations could appear totally different in physical focus, but the tone could be similar, so there would be an attraction.

ELIAS: Absolutely. Yes; just as we have stated that you may hold the same name for essence within translation, and hold different tones. It may translate into the same word, but the tone is not the same. (Pause)

JIM: I have recently experienced feeling a different energy, and feeling a different tone to that energy. Would that be in reference to a remembering of my tone that I’ve recognized? It seems distant, but it seems to be in a different part of me physically.

ELIAS: This once again is a partial incorporation of a remembrance. You shall be manifesting these remembrances in many diverse ways. You shall each manifest different expressions that you will notice in this action of remembrance. Initially, you may experience confusion. You may experience conflict. You may experience even distress within the beginnings of these remembrances, but as you move into this remembrance it shall be very helpful to you for your understanding, and also for your awareness of self. As you incorporate more remembrance of self, you shall be helpful to yourself, and you shall hold a greater ability objectively to be helpful to other individuals also. You are always influencing and helpful subjectively. You are not always helpful objectively! But you are beginning, and this also is a manifestation of this movement of this shift.

We shall be disengaging for this evening, and you may return with your very many questions at our next meeting. I shall affectionately bid you all this evening a very, very fond adieu.

Elias departs at 9:48 PM.


(1) I met Carole at the Seth conference in New Haven. Carole lives in Connecticut, and flew out here to California to attend a session. I must say that Carole is a delightful person, and it was a pleasure to spend a week with her. Hi, Carole! I already miss you! Love, Vic

(2) At this point, the recorded sound started to fade in and out. I wondered if we might lose the rest of the session. Ron listened to it, and couldn’t figure out what was going on. This never occurred again throughout the rest of the tape. Any impressions?

(3) This is in reference to my continuing objections to capitalizing The Creating Universal One And Whole. This has been a continuing area of disagreement between myself and Elias. In my opinion, capitalization of these words implies a separate being or entity, which is distorting. Why do I do it? Respect for the deceased!

< Previous session | Go to the top | Next session >

© 1997 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.