ELIAS: “You must learn to interpret and trust for yourselves, for it serves no purpose, within your widening, for me to be continually validating and offering in-depth explanations now. It is not necessary for personal validation any longer. It is also not necessary for Elias to be thinking for you. You each must be initiating the connections within yourselves.” [session 49, October 29, 1995]
CATHY: “Speaking of viewing things, could you give me any helpfulness to overcome my fear and uncomfortableness with the TFE’s (1), other than the fact that I’m not supposed to rationalize? I realize that, but …
ELIAS: I express to Shynla [Cathy], examine the issue that is mirrored to you, that you notice within Lawrence [Vicki], of control ...
ELIAS: ... in which Lawrence [Vicki] accomplishes well, in moving through and letting go. (To Vicki) Acknowledgment!
VICKI: Thank you. (Rolling her eyes)
ELIAS: Personal invalidation! (Laughter, and then turning to Cathy) Understand that these individuals are elements of your pyramid focus, and are quite trustworthy within this game. As you may allow yourself, within your own solitude, the freedom of meditation, you may also allow the unincorporation of control; and in this, you may amaze yourself at what you may view!” [session 101, June 24, 1996]
VICKI: “I have a question for another individual, if everybody’s finished playing the game. (Pause) For Uriel [Bruce] and Rameau [Sher] (2), within the expression of not wishing to waste anybody’s time here in this group, which has continued to be expressed ...
ELIAS: Personal invalidation!
VICKI: I know.” (Laughter)
(Vic’s note: I’m such a brat, aren’t I, Bruce?) [session 127, October 06, 1996]
BOB#2: “I have a question, Elias. Last September, I was in Denver at the Rocky Mountain Seth Conference. I had a reading from a young lady there that told me, and it was quite surprising actually, that she saw an inordinately high amount of anger in me. That’s the first time that anybody that has done a reading for me had said that, and the reason it was so surprising was because she was pretty adamant about it. As a youngster I certainly did, but I thought I had put that to rest. I’m just wondering if there’s still a lot of unusual anger I haven’t dealt with, or any comments you might want to make.
ELIAS: Let this once again serve as an example to you all; that as you engage activities in this area with physically-focused individuals that connect psychically, misinterpretations may occur, for they are viewing the first layer of consciousness connected with you. They also may be confusing at times of time frameworks; for in connecting to events in probabilities within consciousness, accessing information, it is accessed quite similarly to your dream state, which time frameworks fluctuate within. They are not sequential. Therefore, individuals may misinterpret some information that they connect with objectively and offer this information to you, for their feeling may be quite strong in connecting with the information, but they may also be misinterpreting time frameworks. Therefore, this individual held a recognition of an element of your experience, but misinterpreted the information in time frameworks, viewing also that you are simultaneously all of your aspects and all of your ages presently. Therefore, you may hold an understanding in how an individual may confuse information. They may be tapping into an aspect of you which is present but is also to you past or future, for all of the aspects of your focus are in consciousness simultaneous. Therefore, the recognition is correct, but the objective time framework is not.
BOB#2: Well, that was my feeling, actually. That’s the intuitive feeling I had. I just wondered, because if I did have some issues I certainly wanted to bring them up and deal with them. I have a person in my life who is in the family now that’s a youngster with a lot of anger and is kind of violent, and I thought maybe she might be picking up some of that. But I’m not sure if that’s possible, that maybe a physically-oriented person, a psychic, so to speak, could confuse someone who’s real close to you with your own essence?
ELIAS: This is possible, for they are dealing with energy and not completely objectively holding an understanding of what they are tapping into.
BOB#2: Well, that makes a lot a sense. That’s the way I interpreted it myself, or rationalized it at least!
ELIAS: Ah! Personal invalidation! Do not be discounting of your own intuition!” [session 196, July 20, 1997]
VICKI: “Well, I have a couple of questions. Just briefly for a few people, essence names. One, for Johann.
ELIAS: Johann! (Grinning)
VICKI: I kind of thought that too! That’s funny.
ELIAS: Very good, Lawrence [Vicki]!
VICKI: Well, I figured I was wrong, you know.
ELIAS: Of course! (Laughter) We are quite accomplished at personal invalidation!” [session 247, December 07, 1997]
CATHY: “I’m a little frustrated with my non-acceptance of my physical form thing! (Laughter)
ELIAS: Vessel, vessel, vessel!
CATHY: It’s like, I get what you say. When you look in the mirror you might say yeah, you like what you see, but then you’re thinking no, you don’t, and it’s like ... so what do you do?! (Laughter)
ELIAS: Practice acceptance of self!
CATHY: Oh ... just the way it is.
ELIAS: Quite ... without judgment!
CATHY: Without judgment.
VICKI: It’s frustrating because like I said before, nobody really knows how to do that. I mean, we can sit and talk about it forever!
ELIAS: And we shall! And eventually you shall assimilate and you shall realize how to be creating of this! You ARE learning. You ARE assimilating and you ARE accomplishing. You merely experience frustration, for you view yourselves to not be accomplishing ENOUGH or quickly enough or your periphery is not wide enough, which is all a reinforcement of, ‘YOU are not good enough and YOU are not acceptable.’ As you relax your hold upon your duplicity of self, you also shall discover the ease of your periphery opening automatically.
Once again, within little heads: ‘Oh sure, Elias! We’ll see if this EVER materializes!’ (Laughter) Personal invalidation to you both!” [session 258, January 15, 1998]
SUE: “I have a question. This may be a silly question, but ...
CATHY: P.I. (Laughter)
SUE: What does P.I. mean?
VICKI: Personal invalidation.
ELIAS: She is quite good at recognizing other individuals!” [session 260, January 18, 1998]
SARA: “Okay. I have two more guesses for Virginia.
ELIAS: I have offered you the answer!
SARA: Oh, you have? Sarah?
SARA: Oh, okay. I didn’t understand. Is she still in Virginia right now?
SARA: Okay. Sorry!
ELIAS: (Chuckling) Ah! Personal invalidation! There is no need for apologizing to myself.” [session 289, June 23, 1998]
NANCY: “Okay. I’m going to go to a specific to see if you can help me with something. I recently sold my house. I know it was fear-based thinking that I should go elsewhere. It’s part of that Ramtha (3) strategy that there’s going to be terrible Earth changes around here and whatever, so my husband and I did go ahead and sell our house. We have a longing to be out west, and I’m just feeling so ‘nowhere’ with it. I know I create my own reality, and with the probabilities that are out there, if you could help the small, personal Nancy here and give me some pearls of wisdom?
ELIAS: Personal invalidation! You are not the ‘small person of Nancy!’ (Chuckling) Listen to your inner voice, and be remembering that the information that you have accessed offered by this other essence incorporates belief systems. Therefore, look to yourself ALWAYS. In your evaluation you may incorporate information of other essences, but also do not discount your own soft little voice within you, for this is your communication to you, your language to you of essence, which is directing you.
Individuals within physical focus express this to be their higher self, their intuition, their guide. They attach many different identifications to this soft little voice, but in actuality, this is YOU. This is your essence speaking to you, and it shall not offer you misinformation, and it also shall not offer you information within the confines of belief systems. YOU shall INTERPRET the information THROUGH your belief systems, but the information itself is not presented to you within the confines of belief systems.
Therefore, as you feel a draw to move physically, be acknowledging of yourself in your draw and recognizing that you are purposefully creating a line of probabilities. Your influence in your initial move to be detaching from your dwelling has moved in the area of fearfulness, aligning with information that you have received and accepting this information in fearful aspects.” [session 293, July 01, 1998]
PAULINE: “The group has encouraged me to speak about my personal question tonight. I have an elderly mother-in-law who has been sick for many years, and is being kept alive by medication, and is really very depressed about living in that quality of life. I was wondering if you could tell me a little about what is going on with her.
ELIAS: This may offer an efficient example in conjunction with the subject matter that we have been engaging this evening, for in this expression, one individual engages choices that are very influenced by her beliefs – many different beliefs, not merely one – which also is coupled with the expression of duplicity.
This individual assesses an identification of a belief within a certain quality of what you term to be life, and holds an expectation of that type of expression of quality of life. This expectation is not being expressed objectively, for there are many elements of aspects of beliefs that are intertwined in this situation, one being also that it is unacceptable to be disengaging from physical focus intentionally. Therefore, there is a continuation within the physical focus, but there is also an emotional expression of discontent and uncomfortableness and sadness.
These expressions of these emotions are viewed within the perception of the individual as bad and unacceptable, which perpetuates the expression, for there is great concentration upon these expressions, and as I have expressed many, many times, you do create what you concentrate upon. This is not to say that you create what you concentrate upon objectively always, but you shall create what you concentrate upon in strength within your beliefs.
Therefore, the situation is perpetuated. There is not an objective recognition of the belief systems which are in play, so to speak, in objective expression, and in this, the individual continues upon the hamster wheel and continues to run in circles, expressing much dissatisfaction, but also expressing a powerlessness to alter what is unacceptable.
In this, there is a tremendous expression of the unacceptability of self, for each time you are invalidating yourselves or you are expressing your own helplessness and lack of choices, you ARE invalidating of yourselves and you are expressing a lack of acceptance of self and you are closing your window to your choices, and this moves you into the area of victim.
You hold no choices. You are powerless to be altering of your reality, for you do not create your reality and she does not create her reality. Reality has created this situation for her. Therefore, how may she be altering of it with no choices and with no power? It has been chosen for her, and therefore she is the victim of this situation.
In this, the expression is also quite affecting of individuals objectively surrounding this individual, for the individuals that objectively surround this individual create emotional interaction, and also express sadness and concern and a wishing to be helpful.
This creates a confusion and a frustration within the individuals surrounding this individual, and it also mirrors to you each your own identification within self of the areas that you feel powerless and without choices.
And you continue to push the energy ball, back and forth between you all! Quite a poet! (Grinning and chuckling)
And in this, I express to you, each individual’s choices are their choices, and they create their reality within their choices and in their reasons and through their beliefs and perception.
And in this, you may be focusing upon you, and you shall be offering an expression of energy in focusing upon self and not continuing to play the game. As you continue to play the game, you merely offer energy to what is being created.
Now; I am not expressing to you that if you are not playing the game, this shall automatically alter the choices of this other individual, for it continues to be her choice. But it shall alter YOUR choices and it shall alter your participation, and this is the example of how it shall also alter your perception and your creation of the identification of the feelings that YOU create.
You may continue to view the situation. You may continue to hold understanding and what you identify as compassion for the situation that this individual creates. But if you are not creating a judgment upon the choice of this individual and if you are turning your attention to self and your participation, your identification of your emotions shall turn, and in this, there is no reason to be sorry.
Creating the feeling of sorryness for any individual in their choices is the expression of invalidation, for what you are expressing as you are expressing sorryness for another individual’s creation is your definition and assessment that what they have created is broken, and were they to be fixing this brokenness, you would need not be sorry for them any longer, and in this expression, you are invalidating of their expression and of them by defining to yourself that they are inefficient and inadequate at creating their reality, that there are elements of their reality that are lacking, and there are not!
You participate in this physical reality in a sojourn of exploration, in a momentary expression, to be exploring the creation of physical reality in every type of expression that you may imagine. Therefore, as you all travel through this sojourn, you are not creating a reality that is broken.” [session 472, September 19, 1999]
(1) Vic’s note: a TFE is what is commonly termed a past-life regression, but what we call a TFE – trans-focal encounter. We’ve been facilitating each other in TFE’s for a few years now. No, we have no training, and yes, it works anyway! Our basic “method” is for the facilitator to talk the subject through a general body-relaxation process. Then we encourage the subject to connect with whatever aspect of themselves they choose, and if they allow themselves to do this, we ask questions about their experience. The operative word is “allow.” Quite often the subject feels as if they are “making it up,” which they are not, according to the dead guy!
Digests: find out more about the new game (TFEs).
(2) Paul’s note: these are the essence names Elias uses when referring to Bruce and his wife Sher.
Digests: find out more about essence names.
(3) Paul’s note: Ramtha is an essence who offers information through an energy exchange with a woman named J. Z. Knight.
Digests: find out more about energy exchanges.
Digests – see also: | accepting self | aspects of essence; an overview | belief systems; an overview | choices/agreements | disengage (“death”) | duplicity | effortlessness | essence; an overview | essence names | fear | focus of essence; an overview | hamster wheel | information | mirror action | objective/subjective awareness | perception | engaging periphery | probabilities | pyramid focuses | sapling | shrines | simultaneous time | time frameworks | trusting self | vessel | victims/perpetrators | you create your reality |
The Elias Transcripts are held in © copyright 1995 – 2015 by Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.
© copyright 1997 – 2015 by Paul M. Helfrich, All Rights Reserved. | Comments to: email@example.com