Elias Transcripts – Session 532, Friday, December 31, 1999

I guess for a friend of mine, Fran – she had a session recently, Sandel, and I have a question from her. What is her individual vibrational quality of color? (Pause)

ELIAS: Vibrational quality of color translation, shade of yellow which may be identified as mustard.

STEVE: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are welcome.

STEVE: May I ask the same question for myself? (Pause)

ELIAS: Color quality which translates into your objective reality as sea green.

STEVE: Pea green?

ELIAS: Sea green.

STEVE: Thank you. First off, I wonder if I might get some friend’s and grandchildren’s essence names, family alignment, and orientation.

ELIAS: Very well.

STEVE: Okay, Ariel? (Pause)

ELIAS: Essence name, Taniel; T-A-N-I-E-L. (tan-yel’) Essence family, Sumari; alignment, Vold.

STEVE: Interesting. Thank you.

ELIAS: Orientation in this focus, soft.

STEVE: Okay, thank you. Now, her grandson David?

ELIAS: Essence name, Shu; S-H-U. (shoo) Essence family, Milumet; alignment, Tumold; orientation, common.

STEVE: And my grandson Cooper?

ELIAS: Essence name, Glossal; G-L-O-S-S-A-L. (gloss’el) Essence family, Zuli; alignment, Sumari; orientation, common.

STEVE: And my grandson Elijah?

ELIAS: Essence name, Ali; A-L-I. (ah-lee’) Essence family, Vold; alignment, Ilda; orientation, common.

STEVE: Well, let’s see here. I guess I’ll go into my questions. One thing is, you had stated in one of the sessions that Seth came before you, and after you there would be somebody from the family of Milumet, and that there was somebody before Seth that gave this information. Was that Edgar Cayce?

ELIAS: There have been many individuals within physical focus which have facilitated energy exchanges or have offered information to you through an accessing of their essence and an allowance of translation into your objective reality. Information has been offered to you quite consistently, so to speak, from the onset of your engagement of your species within this physical dimension.

STEVE: Thank you. Let’s see. Could I ask, what other focuses could I easily connect with?

ELIAS: I shall offer to you what may be identified as beginning points for your investigation, that you may continue in your expression of your own exercises, and in this, you may be offering yourself information in conjunction with other focuses in ease.

In one focus that you hold within a physical location of what you identify presently as Canada ... this being a male focus within a time framework of 1400s.

You may also be allowing yourself ease in connection with another focus, of female individual in the physical location of what may be identified presently as Indonesia; time framework, 11th century.

STEVE: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are welcome.

STEVE: Let’s see. I have a question – it’s probably a two-part question, but I’ll read what I’ve written here.

What was the meaning of the mass movement of polio in the latter part of this century, and my participation in those events? And then the seeming eradication of the waves of outbreaks in this country with the advent of vaccines? And then the second part of the question is, is post polio syndrome a different aspect of acceptance of self, as you had mentioned before with AIDS, MS, and other dis-eases? I just wondered if you could give me some information about that.

ELIAS: As to the expression en masse of this dis-ease, the identification that you may associate with this particular physical affectingness may be expressed in explanation in two different manners objectively.

One is the agreement of individuals within your physical dimension to be creating of a dis-ease en masse, that you may allow yourselves the objective expression of investigation of the creation of dis-ease, in part, and therefore also allow yourselves objectively the movement into the action of uncreating this affectingness of dis-ease.

In this particular expression, there are other associations that have been created in conjunction with this expression of this dis-ease.

This particular dis-ease has also been a mass statement, in part, of an objectification of certain elements of dysfunction within physical reality and physical creations, which within this particular century – and in conjunction with this shift in consciousness – has drawn attention to the creations of certain dis-eases, and have moved you in the direction initially of allowing yourselves to widen your awareness – in conjunction with this shift in consciousness – to be viewing your reality in a more expansive manner.

Now; within the creation of this particular dis-ease, the awareness objectively was not expressed in conjunction with how you individually create your reality and create the element of dis-ease, and how you agree to be creating dis-ease collectively en masse also.

But in like manner to other expressions within your physical reality, this has offered the opportunity to open a door, so to speak, into investigations that allow you to view your reality more expansively.

And in this, you offer yourselves – individually and en masse – the opportunity to explore what you may be creating and manipulating in energy in objective physical terms, and also, you have offered yourselves the opportunity to view how each individual may be affecting of this creation of dis-ease in their individual expression through their perception of its creation.

In this, what you have allowed yourselves the beginning points of in the creation of this dis-ease – and the creation of what you identify as its cure, in physical terms – is the movement into an examination of dis-ease, and in that examination, you have allowed yourselves to view the effects of perception in relation to the creation of dis-ease and the participation with dis-ease.

You initially translate this, and continue in some respects presently to hold to this translation, that your attitude or your outlook, so to speak, in your terms, is very affecting of the dis-ease itself, and that the individual holds an element of power or affectingness in conjunction with this creation of dis-ease. Prior to this creation, the mass belief was expressed in the powerlessness of your individual affectingness of dis-ease once it has attacked you, for the creation of dis-ease has been viewed as an element that exists outside of you, that is attacking of you, or that you shall be contracting; not that you are creating this affectingness of dis-ease.

But in allowing yourselves in physical focus to objectively view within your perceptions that you hold an affecting element in conjunction with any form of dis-ease, this opens the door for your movement into a widening of awareness, in objective terms, in the exploration of consciousness, and therefore offers you what you may express as a lead-in, in a manner of speaking, to the concept that you in actuality create your reality – you are not the victim of a particular effect – and as you have opened the door, in part, with the creation of this particular dis-ease, to be viewing yourselves individually as not a victim and that you hold some affectingness in your reality, this also, in a manner of speaking, offers a preparation in physical terms for the movement into an awareness of the concept that you create your reality. Are you understanding thus far?

STEVE: Yes, I am. Thank you. I just wondered, having polio and such like that. It did lead me, I guess, to investigate the Seth material, and the material that you’re giving to us too.

ELIAS: Quite, and this is an objective example of the movement of this particular choice of dis-ease, for in this, there is a choice to be participating in the creation of the dis-ease. There is also a choice to be participating in the movement beyond the actual creation of the dis-ease.

Now; this also, in your expression and your participation individually, is an offering and an allowance of yourself, in the direction that you have chosen in your movement, in your offering of information to yourself, to be allowing yourself the recognition of the concept that you have allowed yourself to be availing yourself of, and that is the concept of acceptance.

You have entered into this session this day with your questioning as to the movement of information, and how it has been offered and how it proceeds in the offering of information in certain individuals participating in offerings of information in linear time framework, and the succession, so to speak, of the progression of that type of information. In like manner, you have offered yourself a progression of information, and have allowed yourself objectively to participate in a type of movement that allows you an objective example of the movement of energy and the incorporation of information in that movement of energy, and this allows you to view your movement individually in conjunction with this shift in consciousness.

Therefore, you allow yourself to participate in the creation of the dis-ease. You allow yourself to view different expressions of affectingnesses within the creation of the dis-ease. You allow yourself to view the action of the opening of the door, that you do hold the ability to be affecting of your creations, which offers a preparation in your movement objectively into your drawing of yourself to information which is offered by Seth.

This offers you a further movement – in objective terms, not merely subjective movement – that you allow yourself the recognition that you create your reality, and you move beyond this assimilation of information into the incorporation of more information, and allow yourself to draw to the information that you are offering to yourself presently – into the acceptance of beliefs and self.

And in this, there is a recognition – or a preparation for an objective recognition – that it matters not what you choose to be creating within your physical expression. The choice itself matters not. The translation of the choice and how you perceive the choice and the judgments that you attach to the choice hold significance in what you may term to be mattering, but the choice itself matters not. It is a choice of experience.

It is your translation of the choice that holds importance or significance in your movement, for in this, as you recognize that you may be accomplishing of any element within your reality that you are so choosing of, it matters not that you choose to be participating in a physical affectingness and continuing that physical affectingness in a particular creation of a dis-ease.

Dis-ease is not in itself what you may identify as negative, and it is not always a creation of blocking of energy. It is identified as dis-ease, for within your beliefs you create a lack of ease within yourself and within your expression of energy and your movement, for you align with beliefs that suggest to you that the physical creation – or the emotional creation or the mental creation – is bad or wrong or broken.

In the acceptance of beliefs and in the acceptance of self, you begin the recognition that whatever you are creating within your physical reality is merely a choice, and it is not within itself good or bad.

In some situations, individuals may be creating the element of dis-ease to be gaining their attention or to be offering themselves an opportunity to view how they are holding to their energy or blocking energy within their own expression, but this is not the rule. Not all individuals are creating of dis-ease for this reason.

In this, you have not created this physical manipulation of energy for that reason. You have created your participation in a movement of consciousness in mass expression, that you may be offering objective examples to yourself throughout your individual focus that shall be beneficial to you, and shall allow you an opening within your awareness into a movement of acceptance of self and of belief systems.

STEVE: Well, thank you.

ELIAS: You are welcome.

STEVE: I guess my next question is, I’d like to ask about a couple of dreams that I’ve had.

ELIAS: Very well.

STEVE: I’ll read them both, and we’ll go from there.

The first dream I probably had two weeks, maybe three weeks ago. I dreamed of two individuals, Bill and George Firth, I think it was, around 1851 or 1861. I recall two symbols of the men, and one was red and one was blue. Then I recall seeing a text. It was black printed on white. It filled my field of vision, and I couldn’t read it. The text seemed to shimmy and vibrate, and I became frightened.

And then the second dream – they seem to be related – I just had the night before last. I’m having some kind of argument with my family, and we seem to have money and we’re wearing tennis whites. And then there seemed to be a torpedo released on the ground to another house, and when it exploded, it left little toy cars in its wake, one being tube-like with black and white markings. And when I looked up, there seemed to be dusty black drapes floating above me with rusty red text printed on them, and the drapes seemed to rustle, as if being blown by the wind. When I woke up, a word came to my mind – thought hooks – and I also recalled seeing the bottom of someone’s legs dressed in white pants, and I thought it was you.

Those are the dreams. I wonder if I could have some help with those?

ELIAS: First of all, I shall express to you that an element of the information that you are offering yourself in objective imagery within this dream symbolization is, the presentment of combination of black and white is the offering of a dream trigger. Therefore, as you allow yourself in any dream imagery to view the combination of black and white together in its many different expressed forms, you may be incorporating this as a dream trigger and you may be allowing yourself to move through this dream trigger as a portal, as I have stated previously.

This allows you greater mobility, so to speak, in your movement in energy within your dream state, allowing you to move beyond merely the dream imagery that you create, and allowing you to be accessing other areas of consciousness. Therefore, it matters not that the black and white combination may be viewed as shoes or as a form of text or a picture or an entire scene, so to speak, devoid of color. Each presentment of the combination of black and white together is the identification of your dream trigger individually.

As to the identification of uneasiness or fearfulness that you have experienced in conjunction with the text that has appeared to you to be unreadable, this is your identification in allowing yourself the beginnings of a recognition of the dream trigger. But this also invokes a slight element within you of fearfulness, for it is unfamiliar and you have not allowed yourself yet to engage this type of activity within your dream state, of engaging this type of action. Therefore, there is in objective terms an unknown element, and this creates a type of uneasiness in your assessment of your encountering of a dream trigger.

As to the presentment of the other individuals within your first dream in conjunction with the presentment of the dream trigger, you have offered yourself a glimpsing of another focus that you hold within this particular physical dimension. You offer yourself the presentment of the dream trigger also, that you may allow yourself a more expansive investigation of that focus if you are so choosing, for if you are allowing yourself to be accessing the dream trigger, you shall automatically with ease allow yourself movement into any aspect of the experience of that focus.

As to the presentment of the movement of the second dream, in this projection of an element that appears initially to be threatening, this also moves in conjunction with the dream trigger. This is also the reason that you assess that these dreams hold an interconnectedness in their imagery, for you are once again presenting yourself with the recognition of another expression of your dream trigger, but in this, you move a little further, so to speak, in your offering of information in conjunction with your dream trigger.

In this, you present yourself an identification of an element that is threatening, which creates movement. This is the identification of your movement into the dream trigger, and that initially it appears threatening, for it is unfamiliar. But subsequently, as you view the explosion of the threat, it confounds you, for it objectifies in imagery as an element that is not threatening, but holds an element of fascination and curiosity, in why shall this element of threat in movement transform itself into an element that is lacking of threat and appears curiously? This is your offering to yourself in imagery, that as you allow yourself to move through these dream triggers, you may be allowing yourself amazement and an engagement of investigation and exploration into many areas of curiosity, as you allow yourself to move with ease within consciousness.

As to your identification of myself in conjunction with the black and white, you are correct. This is an offering to you in energy, that you may allow yourself to engage this combination and this dream trigger without fearfulness.

STEVE: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

STEVE: I see we’re coming up on time here. I wonder if I may ask one more question?

ELIAS: You may.

STEVE: What is my intent within this focus?

ELIAS: The intent that you hold within this focus is not necessarily to be altering of objective choices. Now; hear this, for this holds significance in your movement in relation to this shift in consciousness.

In your expression of your intent in this particular focus, in conjunction with this shift in consciousness, your movement has been and continues to be the expression of allowance – the allowance of participation, not merely with yourself but also in conjunction with other individuals, the allowance of experiences, and the allowance within those experiences to be moving into the expression of acceptance without an alteration of the experiences.

This holds significance, for many individuals presently, within the movement of this shift, offer themselves many, many different expressions of information, and many individuals offer themselves information in the expression of change, but with the attachment of judgment. The motivation for change is to be altering elements within their reality to be expressing “better.”

Therefore, their movement into alterations of their reality or change in their reality is that they may be expressing their reality better, therefore also creating the judgment that the reality that they are creating presently is not adequate, or that there is an element that is wrong with their reality or lacking in their reality.

The intent that you hold in this reality, in this focus, is to be offering – in objective terms – creations within your individual choices in your reality that appear en masse, in the assessment of the mass belief systems, to be needing change. Are you understanding thus far?

STEVE: Yes.

ELIAS: In this, as you project choices and creations within your individual expression of your reality, there is an automatic response in the perception of other individuals that there are elements of your reality that are in need of fixing, and this offers you fertile ground in the expression of your intent to be offering the expression of acceptance, in there being no necessity for fixing what is not broken.

STEVE: Thank you. That explains much. (Elias chuckles) That explains very much. Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

STEVE: Well, I guess we’re coming up on the hour. Mary says you don’t keep track of time, so I guess we’ve gotta cut it off here. (Elias laughs) I was keeping track of time for her. I thank you very much for everything you’ve given me here, and I thank you for all the information that you’ve given to all of us. It’s great.

ELIAS: You are very welcome, my friend, and I express to you encouragement and acknowledgment of your movement in the objective expression of your intent in this focus, and I also shall express to you this day an offering of encouragement in fun, that you be participating in your celebrating of your holiday!

STEVE: Thank you much, sir.

ELIAS: (Laughing) To you this day, in acknowledgment, I offer affectionately, au revoir.

STEVE: Backatcha, guy. Thank you.

Elias departs at 3:02 PM.

Previous session | Go to the top | Next session