Elias Transcripts – Session 1388, Thursday, July 10, 2003

DARYL: I want to start with focuses. Before, you verified that I have a focus named Jennifer, and it seemed like I was calling my attention to her. My impression and someone else’s is that she is my current focus in Japan, although that seems unlikely to me.

ELIAS: In actuality, this is correct, but the individual is in that location temporarily.

DARYL: So she’s not Japanese?

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: But she’s been there; she was there when I first asked?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: So she’s been there a while?

ELIAS: Yes, but does not originate from that location.

DARYL: I don’t suppose you’d want to tell me where she does originate from?

ELIAS: Britain.

DARYL: All right! Thank you.

ELIAS: You are welcome.

DARYL: Is there some reason I’m calling my attention to her? I wondered if she was aware of the Shift or me or something.

ELIAS: Aware of the Shift, yes; aware of you, not yet. But that is a strong potential.

DARYL: Oh great! So I just kind of see what happens with that.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: When the other focus of Ashrah I knew about fragmented, I kind of gave up that I might communicate with myself in that way. (Elias laughs) Great, that’s exciting. Do I have a focus named Rosario?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Is she Mexican?

ELIAS: Spanish.

DARYL: Spanish, as in Spain?

ELIAS: Yes. You do incorporate a Mexican focus, but this is not it.

DARYL: I also asked you before about a Mr. Hyde from San Francisco, which you confirmed. I looked up Hyde Street and found out it was named for a George Hyde, and I wondered if that is my Mr. Hyde.

ELIAS: Yes – continuing with your preference. (Laughs)

DARYL: Well, as soon as I see someone named George, I am curious. Before when we’ve talked, I had two famous focuses I hadn’t discovered. Is he well known enough to be one of those?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: So now I only have one left to discover, I guess.

ELIAS: Correct, unless you alter that.

DARYL: Alter what? The number of famous focuses?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: You’re playing with me, aren’t you?

ELIAS: I am not! (Laughs)

DARYL: When I was looking at the clock and it said 11:11, I got a name that’s pronounced Rodein (row DAY ehn). Is that an 11:11 focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Good, now I’ve got two there. Okay, this is an impression someone else had. Am I either the directing essence or the observing essence of Eleanor Roosevelt?

ELIAS: Ah, neither. You are the focus which may be recognized as a lover.

DARYL: Oh, I’m Lorena Hickok.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: That’s the one? Whoa. So Lorena Hickok is my focus. Wow. Now, is that one of the shared focuses I have as female lovers with the woman I am currently involved with?

ELIAS: No.

DARYL: Now I’m really curious as to who’s Eleanor! (Elias laughs) So Lorena Hickok, is she the other famous focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: So I’m done with that, unless I alter it.

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: Well, that’s good, in some ways. I’ll talk to you about that in a minute. I also have, let’s see, five people I want to see if I’m observing essence of. I thought I could just read you their names and get a yes or no.

ELIAS: Very well.

DARYL: The first one is Paul Simon.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Artist Carol Grigg?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Gracie Allen?

ELIAS: No.

DARYL: Thomas Edison?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Songwriter Cosy Sheridan?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: And philosopher David Hume?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: I’ve been wondering how many observing essences I have, and I came up with 984.

ELIAS: Approximately.

DARYL: Is that something that fluctuates?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: So I do have a lot more than I have focuses, then.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Now, one of the other things that I’ve wondered about and I’ve had this fear that I have a politician focus, because I knew I had one that I had trouble relating to. During my lifetime, the McCarthy hearings have come up over and over again. Do I have some kind of connection with Joseph McCarthy or the hearings?

ELIAS: The hearings, yes.

DARYL: I know I was an observing essence of Lillian Hellmann in that, but there’s some other connection?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Would that have to do with Lorena Hickok?

ELIAS: No.

DARYL: I have been getting lot of water out the bottom of my washing machine, which usually means I’m trying to call attention to bleed-through. Although I felt that I was getting something with Jennifer and with Ashrah, is there some other kind of bleed-through going on that I’m not recognizing?

ELIAS: Not in conjunction with other focuses. You are presenting yourself with physical imagery in association with the current wave in consciousness addressing to the belief system of truth. The imagery that you are presenting to yourself is a type of seeping into or leaking into an awareness of your truths. And your impression as to the other focuses is correct, for that individual is also...

DARYL: Jennifer?

ELIAS: Yes – engaging a presentment of addressment to truths.

DARYL: She isn’t aware of the Elias information, though, right?

ELIAS: No, but similar.

DARYL: This is kind of wild. Myranda and I were joking around recently and she said she thought I needed another famous future focus because I only have the six. She said that I should create one and it should be named George. Then I came up with someone that could change gender at will. Have I created such a future focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Really? And that’s an accurate description?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: So we can decide objectively that we want to create something like that and do it.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Could you tell me maybe what century he’s in, he or she?

ELIAS: Twenty-eighth century.

DARYL: So that’s later than I was before.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Ooo, that’s fun! (Elias laughs) And he can change gender, actually, like just switch.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Is that something that people do in the future?

ELIAS: If they are so choosing.

DARYL: Moving on to some other people and focus questions, is George Donner a focus of Michael?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

DARYL: Is Lewis Keseberg a focus of Fryolla?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Is Peggy Breen a focus of Lawrence?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Is Patrick Breen a focus of Olivia?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Is Charles Stanton a focus of Camden?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

DARYL: Oona did most of those. She’s pretty good at this Donner stuff. (Elias laughs) Is Alfred de Musset a focus of Myiisha?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Okay, that’s interesting. Is Maurice Sand a focus of Duncan?

ELIAS: Observing essence.

DARYL: Is that Duncan’s only connection with the George Sand group?

ELIAS: Acquaintance.

DARYL: Another focus is an acquaintance of George Sand?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Thank you. Thank you for hooking me up with Duncan. It’s been interesting talking with him. Is Johnny Depp a focus of Allesander?

ELIAS: No.

DARYL: So there’s no relation?

ELIAS: No.

DARYL: Is Myiisha observing essence of Michael J. Fox?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Does Milde have a future focus named James?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Is he at the Alterversity?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Does Milde have a future focus named Belinda?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: And she’s in the City?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: And is she black?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Is Cher a focus of Michael? (Pause)

ELIAS: Observing essence.

DARYL: Is Michael either directing essence or observing essence of Gertrude Stein? (Pause)

ELIAS: Directing.

DARYL: Let’s see. Do I share ten focuses with Ling-tu?

ELIAS: Slightly more.

DARYL: I guess my math thing didn’t work that time. (Elias laughs) Now in terms of Myranda, I know at least a few focuses where I know more than one focus of her. I was wondering in terms of our shared focuses if I have 17 focuses that share with one or more focuses of her.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: For Oona, she would like to know if her understanding of her interaction with her focus Jenna is accurate.

ELIAS: Offer explanation.

DARYL: Basically, she’s asking her questions and also sharing experiences with her, she believes, such as giving her daughter a bath. It’s like the veils are kind of coming down between them and they’re interacting.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: But she might not necessarily be understanding every...

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: Oona was describing something to me that sounds like she is getting more objective awareness of her subjective movement, somewhat like I experience as a soft person. Is that correct?

ELIAS: Yes. And thus also her interaction with soft individuals and herself increases in understanding of their language.

DARYL: Yeah, she does hang out with soft people to some degree. (Both laugh) Myiisha had an impression that she has 578 focuses in this dimension. Is that correct?

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: Okay, she’ll be pleased. (Elias chuckles) Now, I have an acquaintance named David who is also known to Myiisha, and I would like to get his information, including essence name, etcetera. ELIAS: Essence name, Weella, W-E-E-L-L-A (WEE luh). And your impression as to essence families?

DARYL: Probably Sumari and possibly soft in orientation.

ELIAS: Sumari belonging to. And your impression as to alignment?

DARYL: I was thinking Tumold.

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: Really? All right! And orientation?

ELIAS: You are correct.

DARYL: That’s great! Is he emotionally focused?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Boy, so I did pick up on his Tumold-ness! That’s great. Fontine also has a question. She wants to know if she’s in transition. Her impression is yes, she is, and that it started last summer.

ELIAS: Yes to the transition. The entrance into that action would be slightly previous to what has been identified.

DARYL: Okay, but you’re not saying exactly when. Should she investigate that or...?

ELIAS: Yes, approximately five months earlier.

DARYL: I’m sure she’ll be happy to get that.

Onto other things besides focuses, let’s see. I am still having the heat things a lot. I’ve talked to you about this several times, and the last time we discussed it, it had to do with discounting myself without thought. Is there anything else going on? I feel like I’m not understanding something about it. It’s happening so much.

ELIAS: Offer your impression of what you have allowed yourself, Ashrah.

DARYL: I can’t think of any impression, although I know I had one at one point. But now I can’t remember what it was. It wasn’t like I felt I knew the answer or anything. Does it have anything to do with sexuality?

ELIAS: Partially, yes.

DARYL: Does it have to do with repressing sexuality?

ELIAS: And intimacy in association with fear, which is associated with your relation to past experiences.

DARYL: So that’s to let me know that I’m doing that at that moment.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: That certainly gives me something to look into. Thank you.

ELIAS: You are welcome.

DARYL: I’ve begun having allergies again. I haven’t had them for a while, at least like this. They seem to be associated somewhat with my dealing with the Donner party, and I was wondering if they’re kind of a new thing with fear in general.

ELIAS: Partially. There is a slight aspect of that, but more generally they are associated with an expression of confusion concerning location within you.

DARYL: Confusion about where I am physically?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: So I don’t know where I am?

ELIAS: No, you know where you are. You merely are unclear and unsure of where you want to be.

DARYL: When you say unclear about where I want to be, that would be physical location?

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: I have been thinking about leaving where I am.

ELIAS: I am aware.

DARYL: I haven’t found any affinity for this place. Does my energy not match?

ELIAS: That would be accurate.

DARYL: Well, if I am going to get out of here, I hope I can generate some money. (Elias laughs) I do feel drawn to go elsewhere.

I’ve had this thing on and off with my garage door stopping when it’s going down, closing. When it originated a few years ago, I thought it was something about indicating that I didn’t necessarily want to go where I was going when I was leaving on that particular trip. But now it’s happening more and it’s happening also when I come home. I wondered if maybe it had to do with kind of opening and closing and vulnerability, something like that.

ELIAS: Yes! I am acknowledging of you in your translation.

DARYL: Does that just mean that I’m having trouble with vulnerability and opening...

ELIAS: No!

DARYL: ...in general, or is there a specific time when...

ELIAS: No, no, no, no, no! That is an indication to you. You are presenting yourself with physical imagery to validate yourself, not to discount yourself.

DARYL: Oh. Okay! So if it’s not closing, I’m remaining open.

ELIAS: Yes! Notice how automatically you move into this discounting.

DARYL: Also, not closing is considered broken, and my neighbor is like why don’t you fix this and stuff. It never occurred to me that...

ELIAS: Let me express to you, there is a tremendous expression of imagery occurring presently and recently concerning fixing, which is also associated with this wave in consciousness.

DARYL: So we might actually be interpreting things opposite of what they are.

ELIAS: At times, yes.

DARYL: Another thing in that area is that on and off for a number of years, sometimes when I turn the key, my car won’t start. It won’t turn over. I have thought of that as something probably I’m doing, although it’s also occurred to me it might be Patel playing with me. What would that imagery be?

ELIAS: It is dependent upon the time framework. Both of your impressions are correct. Therefore...

DARYL: It happened a lot the other night and I had the feeling that was definitely Patel...

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: ...making his presence known.

ELIAS: As I have stated previously, he may be quite a jokester at times.

DARYL: Yes, I’m discovering that.

ELIAS: Quite dear, but quite amusing himself with being the clown. (Laughs)

DARYL: Some of us who are overly serious really appreciate clown showing up every once in a while!

ELIAS: And reminding you to be more playful!

DARYL: I recently had fingers on my left hand that twitched for short amounts of time. I don’t have an impression about what it was, but I do know that in the past, through my hypnosis, I have an association with some of those fingers twitching as a yes signal for myself.

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: So is that a yes signal?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: That’s good to know. It’s nice to know that.

I’ve been having headaches, which I have been thinking are associated with the surges in energy we’ve been having. I’ve also been tired and I’ve had a couple of times lately where I get sleepy, including once when I kept falling asleep while I was sitting up petting my bird. Are those also associated to the energy surges and the new wave?

ELIAS: Yes, and allowing yourself to merely relax within those surges rather than overwhelming yourself or fighting with them.

DARYL: I have been concentrating more on relaxing lately too, especially if my attention is on self and I can relax, then it seems really beneficial.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: I’ve been leaving my bird alone more to go places, and also I want to go to the session in Kentucky, which will involve being gone for two days. I have what I call bird guilt because I picture her, within my beliefs, as sitting around being upset that I’m gone and watching the clock and experiencing this very long timeframe. On the other hand, I know that she might not even exist as I know her while I’m gone. I wondered if you could kind of give me a brief idea what goes on with my bird while I’m gone. (Pause)

ELIAS: I shall express an identification to you that in the time frameworks in which you are not concentrating attention upon this creature, in which you are not in its physical proximity, the creature is experiencing no discomfort and in your terms is content to be expressing itself in whatever matter it chooses, therefore, experiencing a type of freedom in allowing itself to express however it chooses in the moment.

Now; in time frameworks in which you are concentrating upon the creature, not being in its physical proximity, and you are generating an expression of concern, the creature is aware of that and that is affecting.

DARYL: So if I just go out and don’t think about her, then everything is fine.

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes.

DARYL: That’s what I was thinking was probably going on, but it’s nice to hear you say that.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Your creature is not watching your clock but rather allowing itself to enjoy its time framework in which it may be fluttering and singing, and also generating some actions that at times may be annoying to you.

DARYL: Well, I will find my own freedom, then, while away from home. (Elias laughs) I talked to you also before about the trip to the Donner site that some of us are making. Now it involves more of us. Before, we talked about me going there but not visiting the actual site because of preferences and...

ELIAS: Yes, I am aware.

DARYL: Okay. I have gone through times where I thought I was telling myself not to go at all, and I think that was an incorrect translation. I am interested in going now, and I also feel since I have so many close friends who are going to actually go to the site, that I do want to go to the site with them.

ELIAS: Let me express to you, Ashrah, your initial translation was not incorrect. But that may change and has changed to an extent, and may continue to change. That you offer yourself an initial impression is not to say that that is set in stone and that it is unchangeable. In that time framework, what you were offering to yourself was an accurate communication in association with your own apprehension and fear and discomfort in relation to that particular focus, which also was associated with your beliefs now.

You have in this time framework offered yourself different information. You have offered yourself an expression of comfort in association with other individuals. Therefore, your choices are altering also and you may be offering yourself different information now.

This is the snag, so to speak, with most individuals, that you generate such black and white associations, that if you are offering yourself information in one time framework, it becomes an absolute. But it is not an absolute. That is what you are experiencing in that moment. You may be offering yourself other information in subsequent moments, which may change your perception. The flexibility in your perception is the point, for this is what allows you to express your choices and your freedom, and to trust yourself and to express yourself.

DARYL: So, I’m offering myself more freedom in my choices.

ELIAS: Yes, you are.

DARYL: This has been a real beneficial thing then.

ELIAS: Yes! And you are also allowing yourself much more of an expression of trust of yourself in generating choices that you want in association with your preferences, rather than denying yourself in fear, which is a tremendous alteration in your perception, in your movement, Ashrah. For you and I have discussed for an extended time framework the hold that you have placed upon yourself in fear. You are allowing yourself a tremendous expression of freedom now.

DARYL: That’s nice to hear.

ELIAS: (Laughs) I am quite acknowledging of you, my friend.

DARYL: Thank you. We talked before about a theme having to do with gender blending, and I think I’ve come up with another one. I guess I will start with a pyramid action that Myranda and I have been discussing that involves me, Ashrah, Anjuli and Myr, that we call OMA. We believe that Jenna, the focus of Oona, is the fifth pyramid point.

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: My understanding is that it has to do with romantic relationships, sort of traditional and non-traditional.

ELIAS: Correct.

DARYL: While we were discussing this, Myranda had the impression that Cupid is a focus of Ashrah.

ELIAS: Or the translation of, yes.

DARYL: So is there an actual Cupid in another dimension or something that I translate as Cupid?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: But it’s other dimensional.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Along those lines, I think that my theme that goes throughout my focuses has to do with romantic relationships, including integrating romance and sexuality with the concepts of attention on self and other shift information, and that that particularly involves me and Ashrah.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Does that also involve George Sand?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: It also is romantic relationships in general is a theme throughout my focuses.

ELIAS: Yes. What you are identifying is certain focuses that express that more strongly in their exploration than others.

DARYL: Is that why I’ve been dreaming about George Sand so much in the past ten days?

ELIAS: Partially. But also partially in association with this wave in consciousness. That particular focus lends energy to you quite frequently, for you draw yourself to that focus.

DARYL: I draw myself to her?

ELIAS: Yes. Therefore, you generate an openness to the lending of energy.

DARYL: Is that like a one way deal at this point, or is she also getting something from it?

ELIAS: There is a reception in that attention also, but it is quite different for it is assimilated in a very different manner, being nonphysical.

DARYL: Could you put that another way? I am not sure I quite understand that.

ELIAS: The lending of energy is offered to you, for you draw that to yourself.

Now; the other individual, or the other attention, also is experiencing a benefit but in a manner which is quite different, for it is translated nonphysical. It is not being translated in the simultaneous focus. It is being translated in the nonphysical expression of that individual, for the attention has disengaged the physical. Are you understanding?

DARYL: You mean in terms of linear time?

ELIAS: Yes. Therefore, in association with you, the benefit is being experienced nonphysically. The focus is not experiencing the objective recognition of the lending of energy or the receiving of energy. Are you understanding?

DARYL: Somewhat. But I tell you, I’m cutting out your part of the phone so I must be having trouble getting this information right now. I think by the time I get the tape I’ll allow myself to hear it.

ELIAS: Very well. (Laughs)

DARYL: There are blank spaces of like 10, 15 seconds going on. I did wonder, since I’ve found traditional romance kind of to be at odds with having my attention on self. I wondered if you had any great words of wisdom on that.

ELIAS: In what capacity?

DARYL: It seems like I go into regular romantic concepts within my relationship and then my attention is automatically outside of self.

ELIAS: Ah. And that is the familiar.

DARYL: Yeah. As I understand it, what Ashrah and I are concentrating on is how to have a romantic relationship with attention on self.

ELIAS: Correct.

Now; this is not to say that you are not paying attention to the other individual in which you engage the relationship with. You are paying attention to your interaction with the other individual and what they are expressing and their choices and their wants, but you are also paying attention to your responsiveness. This is your attention upon you, paying attention to what you are generating as you are interactive with the other individual.

Now; this extends farther than even your actual physical interaction, for it also includes where your attention is being directed in the time frameworks in which you may not necessarily be in physical proximity with each other or interactive objectively with each other – is your concentration more upon the other individual and their expressions and their wants and their choices and their behaviors than it is upon you?

In this, paying attention to you is not to the exclusion of other individuals. It is paying attention to your responsiveness to other individuals. What is occurring and what are YOU generating in association with your interaction with other individuals? Are you being triggered? Are you reacting? Are you generating emotional communications? What do you want? Are you acquiescing? Are you compromising? Are you comparing? Or are you genuinely paying attention to you and what you want and the freedom to express you: not what you want from the other individual, but what you want to express. Are you paying attention to those choices and are you allowing yourself to express them? Or are you hesitating? Are you constricting?

DARYL: Yes, yes and yes!

ELIAS: These are significant expressions to pay attention to, to allow yourself the freedom of your expression in association with your preferences and what you want. For if you are looking to the other individual to provide you with what you want rather than creating what you want yourself through the freedom of your expressions, what you are actually generating is expectations, and expectations very often sabotage.

This is the significance to paying attention to you. As I have stated, this is not to the exclusion of the other individual. You naturally pay attention to the interactions and what the other individual is choosing, what they are expressing, their behavior; but in that interaction, pay attention to your responsiveness to it.

DARYL: Well, that’s helpful. Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome, my friend.

DARYL: Along the same lines, I guess with the heat thing, sexuality, I feel like I am repressing sexuality. Is that going on?

ELIAS: Correct, for this is an expression of vulnerability in association with your beliefs, and a dramatic expression of your fear of being hurt.

DARYL: Before, I talked about certain aspects of sexuality that I thought of as male energy surfacing, and you indicated that that was also threatening to me.

ELIAS: In some aspects, yes, for it is an unsurety. In that unsurety, you are questioning whether that is acceptable or not.

DARYL: I also feel like there’s, I don’t know, like a desire on my part to be more experimental that I am kind of squashing.

ELIAS: Yes. This is the point of listening to your voice, of listening to your preferences, of allowing yourself your freedom. This is precisely what I am expressing to you – not looking to the other individual to provide to you, but allowing yourself the freedom to express yourself and what you want.

This is tremendously significant, Ashrah, for this is what binds you and restricts you: not allowing yourself to express your own exploration and the fear that that may be unacceptable, which prevents you from even attempting to explore and experiment.

Now; let me express to you, in the allowance of your expression in not discounting yourself, in not doubting yourself, in moving beyond that hold of fear, you may surprise yourself. You do not draw yourself to individuals accidentally or in accidental time frameworks. You draw individuals to you within time frameworks in which they shall be reflective of what you are exploring.

DARYL: I have felt like that’s going on with the person I’m involved with, if I would allow it, especially.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Okay. (29-second pause) Are you there?

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: I thought you were saying something I wasn’t allowing myself to hear again.

ELIAS: No.

DARYL: Hard to tell if the phone is cutting out, because I know that that is another scary area for me.

ELIAS: I am aware.

DARYL: So if I just allow myself to express myself, then I do have a situation where everything would work out fine.

ELIAS: If you are allowing yourself to create what you want, yes.

DARYL: Three weeks ago I felt like I switched primary aspects. At that time, I talked to your energy that’s around me and expressed that I wanted to keep that primary aspect. And it seems to me that maybe I have. Can you tell me what’s going on there?

ELIAS: Yes. You are correct, but also be remembering this is an action that is in alteration quite frequently, and it is not, once again, as black and white as you perceive it to be. Therefore, you may be fluctuating with primary aspects and you may be experimenting with several different primary aspects that are quite similar, allowing yourself to express different qualities.

DARYL: The thing about this one is that I liked it better than the other ones I’ve experienced so far.

ELIAS: What you are experimenting with now is exploring similar aspects to the one that you have identified, that one also included, in fluctuation. For they are very similar and each expresses somewhat of a different quality, which is being explored in relation to what we have been discussing in allowing you to express yourself more fully within your freedom in association with what you want.

DARYL: Okay, that’s pretty exciting. (Elias chuckles) I like it. There seems to be a whole different way of operating than my previous kind of fear-based existence.

ELIAS: Yes.

DARYL: Well, that’s neat. (Elias laughs) Lately, I’ve been feeling also kind of like time is going really fast. I also feel like I’ve been presenting myself with an enormous amount of information and I am having trouble noticing it and translating it all, and that my ability to think just doesn’t work the way it used to.

ELIAS: Allow yourself to relax. This is associated with this wave in consciousness. This is a tremendously powerful wave.

DARYL: Okay. Because I have been discounting myself that I haven’t been doing a good job of keeping up.

ELIAS: No. This is a tremendously powerful wave, and if you are allowing yourself to relax and move in conjunction with it, it may be tremendously empowering and generate a tremendous expression of understanding and freedom. Or you may be moving in opposition to it and generate tremendous conflict.

DARYL: I don’t want to do the second one there. (Both laugh) I’ve had enough tremendous conflict.

ELIAS: This particular wave incorporates a movement that may be exceptionally empowering.

DARYL: That’s exciting, especially since I’m in a place where I maybe can take advantage of that.

ELIAS: Yes. (Chuckles)

DARYL: Say, one last thing is I feel that there’s some kind of connection between what I’m doing with money, where I feel like there isn’t enough and I have to be careful spending it, and energy, where I feel like there’s too much and I have to control it. Is there some kind of connection there?

ELIAS: Yes, there is, and also in association with expression, that in the incorporation of uncertainty there is not enough of that, either.

DARYL: Could you repeat that, please? I blanked out. In association with expression...?

ELIAS: Yes. In your expression of uncertainty, you are generating an association that there is not enough expression that you are generating either, which is strongly associated with your imagery of money. You are not generating money good enough and you are not generating your expressions good enough, either. Therefore, the money is imagery which is reflective of the other.

DARYL: Of my general expression.

ELIAS: Yes, of your allowance of yourself or your withholding of yourself.

DARYL: I just remembered something I wanted to ask about the individual named David.

ELIAS: Yes?

DARYL: He talked about buying candles and having a strong desire to buy blue candles, which was unusual. I felt that that was your introduction to him.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct and you may offer my greetings. Ha ha!

DARYL: I’m sure he’ll like that. (Elias laughs) And speaking of greetings, my friend offers her greetings to you.

ELIAS: And you may reciprocate.

DARYL: Wow. This has certainly been packed full of stuff. (Elias chuckles) It is time for us to say goodbye objectively.

ELIAS: Very well. And you may also offer my greetings and playfulness to the small one.

DARYL: Okay. (Both laugh) They don’t think you’re around. I keep telling them you are.

ELIAS: I am. (Grins)

DARYL: I will do so. Thank you.

ELIAS: Very well. I shall be anticipating our next meeting, Ashrah. I offer my tremendous affection and supportiveness to you, as always. My dear friend, in great lovingness, au revoir.

DARYL: Au revoir.

Elias departs at 5:13 PM.

Previous session | Go to the top | Next session